Universität Bonn & Fraunhofer IAIS
Wikimedia Foundation
Ghent University
USC Information Sciences Institute
Cornell University Library
ORCID
CrossRef
Digital Science
VIVO
VIVO
Weill Cornell Medicine
Ontocale
Duke
CU Boulder
UCSF
UCSF
UCSF
Duke
Symplectic
Symplectic
Symplectic
Symplectic
Symplectic
Symplectic
Thomson Reuters
Cornell
Cornell
Despite the availability of ubiquitous connectivity and information technology, scholarly communication has not changed much in the last hundred years: research ndings are still encoded in and decoded from linear, static articles and the possibilities of digitization are rarely used. In this talk, we will discuss strategies for digitizing scholarly communication. This comprises in particular: the use of machine- readable, dynamic content; the description and interlinking of research artifacts using Linked Data; the crowd-sourcing of multilingual educational and learning content. We discuss the relation of these developments to research information systems and how they could become part of an open ecosystem for scholarly communication.
View presentationSören Auer Professor for Enterprise Information Systems, Universität Bonn & Fraunhofer IAIS
Sören Auer studied Mathematics and Computer Science in Dresden, Hagen and Yekaterinburg (Russia). In 2006 he obtained his doctorate in Computer Science from Universität Leipzig. From 2006-2008 he worked with the database research group at the University of Pennsylvania, USA. In 2008 he founded AKSW research group at University of Leipzig, which he led till 2013. Currently, he holds the chair for Enterprise Information Systems at University of Bonn and leads a department at Fraunhofer Institute for Analysis and Information Systems (IAIS). Sören's research interests include semantic web technologies, knowledge engineering, software engineering, usability, as well as databases and information systems. He led / is leading several large-scale collaborative research projects such as the European Union’s FP7-ICT flagship project LOD2 comprising 15 partners from 11 countries. Sören is co-founder of several high-impact research and community projects such as the Wikipedia semantification project DBpedia, the OpenCourseWare authoring platform SlideWiki.org (received the OpenCourseware Innovation award) and the spatial data integration platform LinkedGeoData.
Fifteen years since the birth of the project, Wikipedia’s vision of a free encyclopedia that anyone can edit has come of age. Today, as one of the top 10 sources of global traf c to DOIs, Wikipedia is not only a comprehensive, multilingual repository of the world’s knowledge: It is also one of the primary entry points to the scholarly literature and a popular vehicle by which scienti c knowledge is disseminated globally. In this talk, I’ll showcase a number of ways in which this vision is augmented by Wikidata – the knowledge base that anyone can edit and Wikipedia’s fastest growing sister project. By linking source metadata to facts and encyclopedic entries, Wikidata allows scholars, librarians, data curators, software developers and volunteer contributors to share in the sum of a new kind of knowledge. I’ll review, in particular, the most recent efforts aiming to incorporate into Wikidata a bibliographic repository and an open citation graph, to ensure that linked open knowledge is also persistently and transparently verifiable.
View presentationDario Taraborelli Director of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
Dario is a social computing researcher and open knowledge advocate based in San Francisco. He is currently the Director of Research at the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that operates Wikipedia and its sister projects. His research spans the behavioral and social aspects of online collaboration and commons-based peer production. As a co-author of the Altmetrics Manifesto and a long-standing open access advocate, he is interested in the design of open systems to promote, track and measure the impact, reuse and discoverability of research objects. Prior to joining the Wikimedia Foundation, he held research and teaching positions at University College London, University of Surrey, Sciences Po, Paris Diderot University, and École Normale Supérieure. He holds a PhD and MSc in Cognitive Science from the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales in Paris, a MA in Philosophy of Science from the University of Pisa, and a licenza from the Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa. He is the joint recipient of a gold prize in Interactive Visualization from the Information is Beautiful Awards. His work has been featured in various outlets including TechCrunch, the Guardian, the Wall Street Journal, BoingBoing, the Chronicle of Higher Education, The Next Web, and Times Higher Education.
For years, scholars, scientists, and practitioners in various elds have been told about the importance of open data. Increasingly, many of us have been asked to publish Linked Data as well. While the publication of Linked Data becomes easier—not the least because of VIVO—consumption often remains dif cult. As such, we might start to wonder: for whom are we creating Linked Data? In this talk, I will argue the importance of decentralization and federation on the Web. I’ll show with practical examples how we can consume Linked Data and make it work for us, today.
View presentationLinked Data on the Web—how can we use it, and how can we publish it? This workshop explores different interfaces to Linked Data using the Linked Data Fragments conceptual framework. There are two main aims of this session: learning to consume existing Linked Data from the Web, and publishing your own dataset using a low-cost interface. Additionally, we will build small applications in the browser that make use of Linked Data. This session is aimed at participants with a technical background, as we will get into the details of Linked Data publication and querying. However, people with a broader interest are also welcome, as participants can work together in groups. If you want to learn what roles Linked Data can play in your organization on a very practical level, this workshop is de nitely for you. If there is interest, this workshop can be extended with a hackathon later, in which people can build prototype applications on top of live Linked Data on the Web.
Ruben Verborgh Semantic Web Researcher, Ghent University
Dr. Ruben Verborgh is a researcher in semantic hypermedia at Ghent University iMinds, Belgium and a postdoctoral fellow of the Research Foundation Flanders. He explores the connection between Semantic Web technologies and the Web's architectural properties, with the ultimate goal of building more intelligent clients. Along the way, he became fascinated by Linked Data, REST/hypermedia, Web APIs, and related technologies. He's a co-author of two books on Linked Data, and has contributed to more than 150 publications for international conferences and journals on Web-related topics.
The Semantic Web offers an approach for integrating heterogeneous data and publishing it using widely-used terminologies to facilitate reuse. Even though SPARQL has been a standard for publishing integrated datasets to application developers since 2010, adoption has been low. Two critical barriers to adoption are the fragility of SPARQL endpoints to heavy loads, and the complexity of the RDF/SPARQL tool-chain. In this talk we present an alternative approach for publishing RDF data using JSON-LD and ElasticSearch, a NoSQL data store. Our experience shows that this approach scales to datasets of billions of triples using commodity hardware, supports sub-second query response times for queries commonly used in Web portals, even under heavy loads, and uses a simpler JSON-based tool chain familiar to most software developers.
View presentationThe VIVO platform has been designed to lower barriers for data interchange and re-use by standard data formats, ontologies, and identi ers consistent with Semantic Web best practices. The workshop will introduce the basic functionalities of Karma data integration tool and provide attendees with hands on training. Attendees will learn how to provide ontologies to Karma, how to load data, how to de ne URIs, how to transform data using Python scripts, how to map the data to the ontology, how to save, reuse and share mapping les, and how to produce RDF and JSON. No prior knowledge of semantic technologies will be assumed. Implementing a researcher pro le system involves aggregating data from a variety of sources. Data needs to be mapped, cleaned and maintained. Participants will utilize the presented tools to: • Model data in a variety of formats with the help of established ontologies (FOAF, FABIO, CITO, BIBO, SKOS, VIVO-ISF) • Understand the use of Web Ontology Language (OWL) • Create RDF data for use in ontology driven applications We will begin with lectures and continue with hands-on demonstration and experimentation. The lectures are designed to help participants gain experience and knowledge of researcher pro ling systems, importance of ontologies, a language for expressing customized mappings from relational databases to RDF datasets (R2RML), the advantage Karma data integration tool offers in transforming data into semantic web compliant data. The workshop will help participants in planning for an organization’s efforts to move existing data into ontology driven applications, like VIVO, to uniquely represent the scholarly outputs of researchers in their institutions and beyond.
Pedro Szekely Research Team Leader, USC Information Sciences Institute
Dr. Pedro Szekely is a Research Team Leader at the USC Information Sciences Institute (ISI) and a Research Associate Professor at the USC Computer Science Department. Dr. Szekely joined USC in 1988 after receiving his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science from Carnegie Mellon University. His current research focuses on algorithms and tools to acquire and reorganize web content to uncover hidden connections to create domain-specific knowledge graphs. These knowledge graphs enable users to use the web for investigative search to answer questions that are not possible to answer with traditional search engines. These tools are being used to construct knowledge graphs about cultural heritage, weapons trafficking, patent trolls, counterfeit electronics and human trafficking. The knowledge graph for human trafficking has been deployed to victim-support and law enforcement agencies helping them to identify victims and prosecute traffickers.
While VIVO can be understood as a platform for creating and managing open linked data, paradoxically and in practice, VIVO can still exhibit elements of “silo” architecture, often a result of the institutional-centric orientation of many existing VIVO installations. In an expanding ecosystem of scholarly systems, as well as the cross-institutional nature of scholarly communication, I ask the question, how does VIVO position itself for the future? In its earlier history, VIVO identi ed itself an open source semantic web application for scholarly networking and discovery (Borner, et. al., 2012, p. 4). What does this mean today? What are the present tensions and future opportunities for VIVO in an era when many new players have entered the eld of scholarly and research infrastructure?
View presentationGeosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationSandy Payette Director of Land Grant and Research IT, Cornell University Library
Sandy Payette joined Cornell University Library in January 2016 as the new Director of Land Grant and Research IT. She leads a portfolio of projects that support Cornell University's land-grant mission, with a particular focus on exposing scholarly and scientific resources on the Web by building “knowledge infrastructure.” In her previous work, Sandy was the co-inventor and chief architect of the Fedora digital repository architecture at Cornell Computing and Information Science. She was the founding CEO of DuraSpace before VIVO joined in 2014. DuraSpace is a not-for-profit organization that provides open source technologies and community resources to help preserve the world’s intellectual, cultural, and scientific heritage in digital form. Sandy also served as Research Investigator at the University of Michigan where she provided leadership in building technologies to support sharing and publication of research data in the context of SEAD, an NSF DataNet partner. Sandy's educational background is inter-disciplinary, with degrees in computing and information systems, MBA, MS Communication, and currently a PhD candidate at Cornell’s Department of Communication.
A globally interconnected research world is the norm. This offers great opportunities for communication and collaboration across elds of research, but it also comes with great challenges, in particular for systems interoperability. Many technology products, systems and tools have been created to help universities and other research organizations meet these challenges while achieving their strategic goals. This is creating a new challenge: a confusing stack of technology for users to assemble into a functional research ecosystem. This panel will explore how one university, Texas A&M, selected and implemented a technology stack and is using it to achieve their strategic plan, “Vision 2020: Creating a Culture of Excellence.” Their stack includes: • VIVO • ORCID • Repositories, Vireo & DSpace • PlumX The panel will discuss the components and the interactions between them, to provide the audience concrete examples of a working, interconnected research ecosystem. Texas A&M will describe its process for de ning its technology needs, who was engaged, and the questions that drove decision- making. They will describe their current technology stack, and the connections between the components. One cross-platform connector used by Texas A&M is the ORCID ID, which is allowing them to integrate information about researcher works and af liations across various systems and present this information in their VIVO instance. ORCID will describe how ORCID identi ers are being used at universities to assert researcher af liation, and how universities may bene t from integrations by publishers and funders. Consortia approaches to implementation and adoption will be discussed, as well as the use of ORCID in federated identity management systems such as eduGAIN, and how ORCID interacts with identi ers for works and organizations. Green open-access institutional repositories are a key component of a research ecosystem. It is the container for the research output conducted at the university. Recent studies have shown that opening up access to research creates more usage and citations for that research. Texas A&M implemented Vireo for theses and dissertations and DSpace for faculty research. How is all of this enabling Texas A&M to measure progress toward its strategic goals? As a component of its tech stack, Texas A&M has integrated PlumX to track research metrics in ve categories: usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations. Sometimes this is referred to as altmetrics. This part of the panel will include a discussion of what Texas A&M has discovered by tracking metrics across disciplines including output for the humanities. It will also showcase some other use cases of metrics in institutional repositories, analytics reports and researcher dashboards.
View presentationLaurel Haak Executive Director, ORCID
Dr. Laurel Haak drives awareness of the ORCID mission, building strategic relationships, working with a broad range of constituents, ensuring organizational persistence, and directing ORCID staff and contractors. Previously, Laure was Chief Science Of cer at Discovery Logic, Inc.; a program of cer for the US National Academies' Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy; and editor of Science's Next Wave Postdoc Network at the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Laure received a BS and an MS in Biology from Stanford University and a PhD in Neuroscience in 1997 from Stanford University Medical School, and she was a postdoc at the US National Institutes of Health.
Jennifer Lin Director of Project Management, CrossRef
Dr. Jennifer Lin has fteen years’ experience in product development, project management, community outreach, and change management within scholarly communications, education, and the public sector. She joins Crossref after four years at the Public Library of Science (PLOS) where she oversaw product strategy and development for their data program, article- level metrics initiative, and open assessment activities. Prior to PLOS, she was a consultant with Accenture working with public sector and Fortune 500 companies to develop and deploy new products and services. Jennifer earned her PhD at Johns Hopkins University. She can be reached via twitter @jenniferlin15 or email jlin@crossref.org.
Over the past few years, VIVO has gained global appeal amongst institutions. However, many institutions struggle to get past the early adopter phase and ‘go live’ with their own VIVO. As Registered Service Providers of VIVO, we are often asked for ‘showcase’ VIVO systems to display. We will typically send them examples where institutions have undertaken large customisation projects on top their VIVO, like Grif th University. Institutions who adopt VIVO still struggle to nd a focus for the ‘stock’ version. For it to be an effective showcase of an institution’s data, there needs to be consideration of usability and design to realise its full potential, to make it a true centre of the expertise of an institution. Many institutions do not always have the resource or expertise to achieve this.
View presentationOne of the challenges for the progression of research metadata standards is that technology often gets in the way. Bound by the pressure not to be weighed down by technical debt, and the desire to appeal to as broader an audience as possible, the adoption of metadata standards within technology platforms is conservative. Ideally, this is not how things should be. The adoption of standards and practices should be community led, with technology functioning as the enabler. This presentation will showcase one attempt to move closer towards this goal by semantically enabling Figshare as a basis for rapid ontology development and adoption. As part of the work required to build the FORCE2016 OpenVIVO initial implementation, a mapping from the Figshare API to VIVO RDF was created. This work was then extended to expose all RDF documents that are part of a Figshare record as a single RDF graph. It is intended that this graph be accessible from the Figshare article URL when RDF is requested. With two developments: • The use Figshare API to create custom metadata forms that can write additional triples to a Figshare article, and; • The inclusion of RDF as a metadata output of Figshare’s new OAI-PMH feed; Figshare records can now be annotated with new ontologies that are immediately discoverable. As a concrete example of this approach, a working supplementary metadata form will be demonstrated that allows authors to be annotated with organizational af liations, and additional roles assigned using the draft CRediT ontology. In a similar fashion, this same approach can be used to extend the adoption of a greater part of the VIVO ontology beyond faculty pro les. Through the harvesting of Figshare records into Symplectic Elements, Figshare records can be linked to grants and publications in Elements, and then this additional metadata pushed back onto the Figshare record as VIVO RDF through the reuse of Symplectic’s VIVO harvester code. In this presentation, we will demonstrate the rst iteration of a user-focused, modern reimagining of the VIVO interface. Using Bootstrap and CSS, we will show how some layout and design improvements can work wonders on the stock VIVO interface. Coupled with some basic SEO knowledge, any institution can use these simple methods to drastically improve their own VIVO and make it the ‘expertise’ hub it’s destined to be. We will also demonstrate a new set of integrations with products such as Altmetric, gshare and The Conversation to help further enrich and showcase institutional data and expertise.
Simon Porter VP Academic Relationships & Knowledge Architecture, Digital Science
Simon Porter comes to Digital Science from the University of Melbourne, where he has worked for the past 15 years in roles that span the Library, Research Administration, and Information Technology. Beginning from a core strength in the understanding of how information on research is collected, Simon has forged a career transforming University practices in how data about research is used, both from administrative and eResearch perspectives. In addition to making key contributions to research information visualization and discovery within the University, Simon is well known for his advocacy of Research Pro ling Systems and their capability to create new opportunities for researchers. Over the past three years, Simon has established and run the annual Australasian conference on research pro ling. In 2012, Simon was the the program chair of the third annual VIVO conference held in Miami.
One of VIVO’s greatest strengths is its ability to provide all its data for reuse. This workshop will introduce the attendees to SPARQL (SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language), the W3C standard for querying RDF data. VIVO comes with SPARQL ready for use. SPARQL will be introduced as well as the basic concepts needed to get data from VIVO, such as Resource Description Framework (RDF), URI (Uniform Resource Identi er) and the VIVO ontologies. Each will be explained in simple terms and reinforced by example. Attendees will work in groups, and the groups will work through simple examples, to moderately complex examples for SPARQL queries for real-world examples of using VIVO data. Attendees will learn how to export data returned by SPARQL queries to spreadsheets for subsequent data analysis, tabulation or visualization. This is an introductory workshop, no prior knowledge of SPARQL, RDF, or the VIVO ontologies is needed to participate. Following the workshop, attendees will be able to read VIVO ontology diagrams, and use these diagrams to write and run SPARQL queries on their VIVOs.
View presentationThe VIVO Pump is a new tool for managing data in VIVO. The Pump allows data to be managed in spreadsheets -- simple rows and columns corresponding to attributes of entities in VIVO. Using the Pump, a data manager can 'get' data from VIVO into a spreadsheet, modify the values, and/or add rows, and then 'update' VIVO using the improved spreadsheet. Enterprise data can be loaded into VIVO using and update from a spreadsheet. The Pump uses de nition les in JSON format to de ne the mapping between spreadsheet rows and columns, and VIVO's graph data models. De nition les are included with the Pump for managing people, positions, educational background, organizations, publications, grants, teaching, service, mentoring, dates, journals and concepts. No knowledge of the VIVO ontology is required to use delivered de nition les. De nition les are used to 'round trip' data -- the same de nition is used to perform the 'get' as to perform the 'update.' The Pump can be used to load data to new VIVOs as well as for managing data of established VIVOs. Additional features of the Pump include 'enumerations' -- simple translation tables that allow the Pump to convert between terminologies and identi ers, and 'filters' which can be assigned to columns to perform routine standardization of values. The Pump is completely domain agnostic. De nition les can be created for any set of ontologies to manage any graph data as spreadsheets. In this talk, we will describe the design goals of the Pump and provide examples of its use to manage data in VIVO. The Pump is fully documented in on-line resources, as well as PDF and eBook formats. The Pump is open source software, made freely available under the Apache License.
View presentationOpen VIVO is a demonstration of an open VIVO that anyone with an ORCID identi er can use. Users can join Open VIVO. The project engaged more than a dozen team members in creating infrastructure, branding, a new contribution ontology, new interactive elements, new datasets of RDF for VIVO, and new reuse elements. Open VIVO provides an opportunity for every scholar to participate in an immediate way, to add data and indicate contribution to scholarly works, and to provide data in a truly open and accessible manner on a daily basis. In this panel, participants in the Open VIVO project will share their views on the project, its goals and results. Elements of Open VIVO will be ported to future versions of VIVO. Implications of Open VIVO for VIVO will be discussed.
View presentationMike Conlon Project Director, VIVO
Dr. Michael Conlon is an Emeritus Faculty member of the University of Florida and serves as VIVO Project Director for Duraspace. Dr. Conlon formerly served as Co-director of the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute, and as Director of Biomedical Informatics, UF College of Medicine. His responsibilities included expansion and integration of research and clinical resources, and strategic planning for translational research. Previously, Dr. Conlon served as PI of the VIVO project, leading a team of 180 investigators at seven schools in the development, implementation and advancement of an open source, semantic web application for research discovery. Dr. Conlon has served as Chief Information Of cer of the University of Florida Health Science Center where he directed network and video services, desktop support, media and graphics, application development, teaching support, strategic planning and distance learning. His current interests include representation of scholarship, and research data sharing and reuse.
Following the 1.8.1 release of VIVO, the build environment was migrated from the existing Ant scripts, to using the Maven project descriptors. This brings a number of bene ts: it’s a more immediately-familiar environment for many Java developers. Modern IDEs can read the project description and immediately set up the environment automatically, and we’re able to better declare and manage the dependencies. However, in order to make the project look and feel familiar to a new user approaching the project from a Maven perspective, with an expectation of a standard project layout, the structure of the Vitro/VIVO projects needs to change slightly. This half-day workshop will help people understand how the project structure has changed in VIVO 1.9, and to show them how to adapt their existing codebases when upgrading. It will also provide an introduction to the Maven project layout for new users, and show them how they can make effective use of Maven when creating a new VIVO implementation.
Whilst the 1.8 release of VIVO had brought a number of usability improvements, there had been a slight catch: general page rendering was slower. It was important to address this, and so optimization was the key priority of a minor point release. The release of 1.8.1 managed to not just reverse the performance loss, but to gain around 30% improvements on the 1.7 release - without changing any of the data model, or triple store implementation. In this talk, I will show how using a pro ler identi ed areas of concern, the strategies that were applied to improve the performance - including some signi cant changes to the models cached in the application layer - and some tips for thinking about performance when customizing or developing for VIVO.
View presentationGraham Triggs Technical Lead, VIVO
New to VIVO as a new team member or part of a new implementation? What is VIVO all about? How did VIVO evolve and what bene ts does it offer to researchers, to institutions, and to the global community? This workshop provides an institutional perspective from others who have worked with VIVO. You’ll meet six VIVO community members with years of experience with VIVO at different institutions. The presenters will talk about how VIVO is used in their organizations, where the data come from, how VIVO is managed, and how to feed downstream systems. You’ll learn how to nd the right resources as a new VIVO implementation — data sources, team members, governance models, and support structures. This workshop brings best practices and “lessons learned” from mature VIVO projects to new implementations. We’ll help you craft your messages to different stakeholders, so you’ll leave this workshop knowing how to talk about VIVO to everyone from your provost to faculty members to web developers.
View presentationAdministration at Weill Cornell Medicine has called upon the Library to track authorship for thousands of individuals including faculty, postdocs, and alumni. Until identi ers like ORCID are adopted more widely and used more consistently, author disambiguation remains an important challenge towards producing valid and real-time reports of publication activity. At the 2015 VIVO Conference, we presented ReCiter, a Java-based tool which uses institutionally-maintained data to perform author name disambiguation in PubMed. Since last year’s conference we have continued to improve the performance of ReCiter. In our set of 63 randomly selected existing faculty members, ReCiter can now assert author identity at over 97% accuracy. In a randomly selected sample of 20 alumni, ReCiter performed at 93% accuracy, and, for active students this gure was 80%. ReCiter employs 15 separate strategies for disambiguation. The range of data used spans six systems of records: Of ce of Faculty Affairs, Human Resources, alumni database, student database, physician pro le system, and the grants management system. For our test set of data, we have established which data are most powerful in contributing to overall accuracy. These include: known co- investigators, known department, and year of doctoral degree. Our team has designed ReCiter to be generalizable. Our goal is to determine if the high accuracy we note can be achieved at other sites. The code will be shared with the community.
View presentationMany metrics may be used to evaluate a researcher’s scholarly impact. Because research articles are a prominent currency of academic scholarship, citation impact plays a central role in scholarly impact assessment. Times cited data are highly skewed, and it is well recognized in the bibliometrics literature that nonparametric approaches are appropriate for skewed distributions. By convention in bibliometrics the scholarly impact of an article is assessed against a reference set of other articles of the same publication type (i.e. academic article or review), in the same eld, and published the same year. The articles in the reference set are used as a baseline to calculate the percentile rank of the number of times a given article has been cited. To our knowledge, no currently available systems are capable of displaying article-level impact based on percentile rank of times cited for the entire percentile distribution. To support research impact assessment, we have developed the Citation Impact Tool, an interactive component of VIVO Dashboard. The system allows users to assess the percentile rank of the number of citations speci c articles have received relative to peer publications. Publications are individually benchmarked against reference sets of 200 articles of the same type, topical category of journal, and year of publication. Times cited data comes from Elsevier’s Scopus. The system uses an iconographic bar chart to portray article-level citation impact of multiple articles in one view, and allows users to lter by type of article, author order ( rst/last author rank), and topical category. The system uses Thomson Reuters Web of Science journal categories to assign articles to individual elds. When an article is in more than one category, the percentile rank of times cited is calculated separately against a separate reference set of articles for each category. A mean percentile rank for the article across categories is then calculated and, in turn, used in the bar chart. Because recently published articles have had little time to accumulate citations, articles from the past two to three years are deliberately excluded from the charts. The code will be shared with the community
View presentationPaul Albert , Weill Cornell Medicine
New to VIVO as a new team member or part of a new implementation? What is VIVO all about? How did VIVO evolve and what bene ts does it offer to researchers, to institutions, and to the global community? This workshop provides an institutional perspective from others who have worked with VIVO. You’ll meet six VIVO community members with years of experience with VIVO at different institutions. The presenters will talk about how VIVO is used in their organizations, where the data come from, how VIVO is managed, and how to feed downstream systems. You’ll learn how to nd the right resources as a new VIVO implementation — data sources, team members, governance models, and support structures. This workshop brings best practices and “lessons learned” from mature VIVO projects to new implementations. We’ll help you craft your messages to different stakeholders, so you’ll leave this workshop knowing how to talk about VIVO to everyone from your provost to faculty members to web developers.
View presentationBrian Lowe , Ontocale
New to VIVO as a new team member or part of a new implementation? What is VIVO all about? How did VIVO evolve and what bene ts does it offer to researchers, to institutions, and to the global community? This workshop provides an institutional perspective from others who have worked with VIVO. You’ll meet six VIVO community members with years of experience with VIVO at different institutions. The presenters will talk about how VIVO is used in their organizations, where the data come from, how VIVO is managed, and how to feed downstream systems. You’ll learn how to nd the right resources as a new VIVO implementation — data sources, team members, governance models, and support structures. This workshop brings best practices and “lessons learned” from mature VIVO projects to new implementations. We’ll help you craft your messages to different stakeholders, so you’ll leave this workshop knowing how to talk about VIVO to everyone from your provost to faculty members to web developers.
View presentationAndi Ogier ,
New to VIVO as a new team member or part of a new implementation? What is VIVO all about? How did VIVO evolve and what bene ts does it offer to researchers, to institutions, and to the global community? This workshop provides an institutional perspective from others who have worked with VIVO. You’ll meet six VIVO community members with years of experience with VIVO at different institutions. The presenters will talk about how VIVO is used in their organizations, where the data come from, how VIVO is managed, and how to feed downstream systems. You’ll learn how to nd the right resources as a new VIVO implementation — data sources, team members, governance models, and support structures. This workshop brings best practices and “lessons learned” from mature VIVO projects to new implementations. We’ll help you craft your messages to different stakeholders, so you’ll leave this workshop knowing how to talk about VIVO to everyone from your provost to faculty members to web developers.
View presentationMichaeleen Trimarchi ,
New to VIVO as a new team member or part of a new implementation? What is VIVO all about? How did VIVO evolve and what bene ts does it offer to researchers, to institutions, and to the global community? This workshop provides an institutional perspective from others who have worked with VIVO. You’ll meet six VIVO community members with years of experience with VIVO at different institutions. The presenters will talk about how VIVO is used in their organizations, where the data come from, how VIVO is managed, and how to feed downstream systems. You’ll learn how to nd the right resources as a new VIVO implementation — data sources, team members, governance models, and support structures. This workshop brings best practices and “lessons learned” from mature VIVO projects to new implementations. We’ll help you craft your messages to different stakeholders, so you’ll leave this workshop knowing how to talk about VIVO to everyone from your provost to faculty members to web developers.
View presentationA frequent request from Duke faculty members is, 'Can I create a CV from Scholars@Duke?' Now we can say, 'Yes!' Last fall, the School of Medicine's Appointments, Promotions and Tenure Committee asked for a CV generator to help streamline dossier submissions as well as to encourage maintenance of Duke's VIVO implementation, Scholars@Duke. With the help of the APT committee and the VIVO widgets, users can generate (client- side) a simple CV in a Word document. The Scholars@Duke team is working to enhance the CV by adding a number of user-maintained elds. Phase two of the Scholars CV will take many months and a lot of development effort -- will the APT committee like it? And more importantly, will faculty use it? Get the inside scoop at this presentation.
View presentationUsers are searching Duke’s VIVO, Scholars@ Duke for many reasons: Duke faculty to identify collaborators for research efforts, prospective students and their families to learn about our faculty and scholarship, patients to learn more about our medical providers, and industry to locate expertise. But many of our users have told us that our current search functionality is insuf cient to effectively and optimally facilitate those use cases. In this presentation, we will discuss in more detail the feedback which prompted this proposed enhancement of our search functionality, as well as, the key elements of the analysis and considerations that informed our nal design. Faculty and our broader user community have requested search functionality that enables them to lter results to the level of granularity required and by facets that are helpful. In addition, they would like to sort the search results by relevance or other factors to provide context for the results listed. Also, some users are seeking a very speci c set of results and need an 'advanced' search that’s easy to use. Our proposed enhancement of the Scholars@ Duke search functionality seeks to address those limitations by enhancing our basic search to provide more effective ltering of search results, enabling the search results to be sorted by relevance, and adding new advanced search capabilities.
View presentationDuke and UCSF have come up with ways to make their research networking platforms indispensable at their institutions, winning friends and allies, and strengthening the case for renewed funding. Others can do this too — but only if we retro t VIVO, Pro les, and other platforms with simple data reuse mechanisms. In this session, we’ll talk about techniques for developers, traf c growth on downstream sites, and researcher engagement. We’ll look at examples of sites that consume VIVO and Pro les data and talk about what it’s like to share data across nearly 50 local websites and apps.
View presentationJulia Trimmer , Duke
New to VIVO as a new team member or part of a new implementation? What is VIVO all about? How did VIVO evolve and what bene ts does it offer to researchers, to institutions, and to the global community? This workshop provides an institutional perspective from others who have worked with VIVO. You’ll meet six VIVO community members with years of experience with VIVO at different institutions. The presenters will talk about how VIVO is used in their organizations, where the data come from, how VIVO is managed, and how to feed downstream systems. You’ll learn how to nd the right resources as a new VIVO implementation — data sources, team members, governance models, and support structures. This workshop brings best practices and “lessons learned” from mature VIVO projects to new implementations. We’ll help you craft your messages to different stakeholders, so you’ll leave this workshop knowing how to talk about VIVO to everyone from your provost to faculty members to web developers.
View presentationThis presentation will explore the motivations behind and report early results of the VIVO for Historical Persons (VIVO4HP) project. This experiment seeks to reuse and extend VIVO and the VIVO-ISF ontology to represent and facilitate discovery of historical persons, a humanities use case that re ects VIVO’s original purpose. We will address whether VIVO can be reasonably adapted to this purpose, which would be of interest to a wider digital humanities community including other projects that are using linked data. VIVO4HP’s initial use case focuses on historical persons belonging to a speci c professional community – diplomats that served England in the seventeenth century. Our target data is derived from the standard British biographical source, the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (ODNB). This authoritative data set will be supplemented by event data on diplomatic missions from A Handlist of British Diplomatic Representatives. VIVO presents Linked Open Data, which offers the potential to make our use case data available to other digital humanities projects and applications for subsequent analysis, evaluation, and visualization. We are undertaking this experiment as a multi- stage project. The rst step is to manually create pro les in VIVO for a limited number of diplomats to identify issues with the source data, default ontology, data mapping and transformation, and online display. The second is to make adjustments to the ontology and online display to address gaps. The VIVO- ISF ontology re-uses and extends a number of established ontologies, such as FOAF and BIBO, and we will evaluate the integration of other ontologies relevant to our use case. The third is to automatically ingest ODNB data into VIVO, using custom scripts where possible to address data mapping and transformation issues. The nal step is to augment the pro les with other data sources, such as historical sources, other web sites, and linked data. We anticipate a variety of challenges and will be prepared to discuss how we addressed these. General issues with historical data include dealing with data ambiguity (e.g., dates, spelling variations), incomplete biographical information, individuals’ identities (e.g., using noble titles instead of their personal names), and historical geographies. The ODNB data was created with another purpose in mind and thus can be incomplete. It may be untagged or not tagged to the speci city necessary for certain types of data that might be desirable to represent for our use. Lastly VIVO is meant to represent a researcher’s professional life, and does not incorporate some of the personal, political, or social aspects desirable for representing historical persons. How our experiment is able to deal with these issues, and the level of intervention required, are key factors in our assessment of VIVO’s utility for the discovery and representation of historical persons. This focused assessment of extending VIVO for a humanities purpose should be of interest to a segment of VIVO conference attendees and community members. We hope to show that VIVO4HP provides an example that other humanists can build upon to represent, facilitate discovery of, and share linked data about historical persons.
View presentationAlex Viggio , CU Boulder
The VIVO platform has been designed to lower barriers for data interchange and re-use by standard data formats, ontologies, and identi ers consistent with Semantic Web best practices. The workshop will introduce the basic functionalities of Karma data integration tool and provide attendees with hands on training. Attendees will learn how to provide ontologies to Karma, how to load data, how to de ne URIs, how to transform data using Python scripts, how to map the data to the ontology, how to save, reuse and share mapping les, and how to produce RDF and JSON. No prior knowledge of semantic technologies will be assumed. Implementing a researcher pro le system involves aggregating data from a variety of sources. Data needs to be mapped, cleaned and maintained. Participants will utilize the presented tools to: • Model data in a variety of formats with the help of established ontologies (FOAF, FABIO, CITO, BIBO, SKOS, VIVO-ISF) • Understand the use of Web Ontology Language (OWL) • Create RDF data for use in ontology driven applications We will begin with lectures and continue with hands-on demonstration and experimentation. The lectures are designed to help participants gain experience and knowledge of researcher pro ling systems, importance of ontologies, a language for expressing customized mappings from relational databases to RDF datasets (R2RML), the advantage Karma data integration tool offers in transforming data into semantic web compliant data. The workshop will help participants in planning for an organization’s efforts to move existing data into ontology driven applications, like VIVO, to uniquely represent the scholarly outputs of researchers in their institutions and beyond.
Violeta Ilik ,
This workshop is designed to help institutions build, leverage, and deploy the information within their RNS across the institution. The goal is to increase awareness of, engagement with and dependence on your RNS to solidify the RNS’ roles in supporting researchers. Note that the takeaways from this workshop can be applied to your RNS regardless of the underlying product, and will work for a VIVO, Pro les, “home grown,” or commercial RNS installation. This workshop will provide a mix of lecture, discussion, exercises, and templates to enable participants to replicate the successful engagement at UCSF — and avoid our biggest mistakes. Use of this approach has garnered 1.3 million visits a year, 2,800 customized pro les, and 38 outbound data reuse integrations for UCSF Pro les. This workshop will discuss ways to make your RNS indispensable in each phase of the implementation: Setting the Stage • Auto-added data: add as much data as possible to your RNS - publications, grants, photos, news stories, etc. • Google Analytics - the crucial substrate • Pre-packaging of publications, people and connections • APIs to make the data available • Targeting and messaging decision makers appropriately Dress Rehearsal • User support - answer the emails! • Senior leadership support • Deploy APIs to power other websites • Search engine optimization Opening Night & The Season • Engagement email campaigns • Bootcamps and department meetings • Finding and catering to the “power users” • Iterative process of growing user base/traf c and providing more data/features After Party • Wrapping it all up to show the value of your RNS in an executive level report for the higher administration
UCSF proposes to present an update to last year’s presentation on Leveraging Personalized Google Analytics Information for Greater RNS Engagement. We have launched a personalized dashboard and promoted it in various ways. We would like to share our learnings with the RNS community including progress on getting pro le page owners to sign in for personalized content and what we can learn from their signed-in behavior. We’ll also discuss ideas for next steps.
View presentationDuke and UCSF have come up with ways to make their research networking platforms indispensable at their institutions, winning friends and allies, and strengthening the case for renewed funding. Others can do this too — but only if we retro t VIVO, Pro les, and other platforms with simple data reuse mechanisms. In this session, we’ll talk about techniques for developers, traf c growth on downstream sites, and researcher engagement. We’ll look at examples of sites that consume VIVO and Pro les data and talk about what it’s like to share data across nearly 50 local websites and apps.
View presentationBrian Turner , UCSF
This workshop is designed to help institutions build, leverage, and deploy the information within their RNS across the institution. The goal is to increase awareness of, engagement with and dependence on your RNS to solidify the RNS’ roles in supporting researchers. Note that the takeaways from this workshop can be applied to your RNS regardless of the underlying product, and will work for a VIVO, Pro les, “home grown,” or commercial RNS installation. This workshop will provide a mix of lecture, discussion, exercises, and templates to enable participants to replicate the successful engagement at UCSF — and avoid our biggest mistakes. Use of this approach has garnered 1.3 million visits a year, 2,800 customized pro les, and 38 outbound data reuse integrations for UCSF Pro les. This workshop will discuss ways to make your RNS indispensable in each phase of the implementation: Setting the Stage • Auto-added data: add as much data as possible to your RNS - publications, grants, photos, news stories, etc. • Google Analytics - the crucial substrate • Pre-packaging of publications, people and connections • APIs to make the data available • Targeting and messaging decision makers appropriately Dress Rehearsal • User support - answer the emails! • Senior leadership support • Deploy APIs to power other websites • Search engine optimization Opening Night & The Season • Engagement email campaigns • Bootcamps and department meetings • Finding and catering to the “power users” • Iterative process of growing user base/traf c and providing more data/features After Party • Wrapping it all up to show the value of your RNS in an executive level report for the higher administration
The second annual SEO State of the Union dives back into the world of search engine optimization for research networking sites. Search engines like Google are, in many cases, the most critical pathway for discoverability for research networking platforms. UCSF Pro les, for example, receives over 80% of its visits (about 100k of 125k visits per month) via Google. But not all research networking platforms perform equally well on search engines. The rst annual SEO State of the Union 2015 broke down real-world SEO performance for over fty public research networking sites. We will present updated ndings for 2016, including a detailed overview of how different implementations and platforms rate in terms of search engine discoverability, stratifying by platform and type of deployment. We will present ve key ndings into the real- world factors that impact search engine traf c, both at the level of the entire site, and also between different pro le pages on the same site. These ndings will be helpful at every stage of the research networking process, from product evaluation/selection to the promotion of mature platforms.
View presentationDuke and UCSF have come up with ways to make their research networking platforms indispensable at their institutions, winning friends and allies, and strengthening the case for renewed funding. Others can do this too — but only if we retro t VIVO, Pro les, and other platforms with simple data reuse mechanisms. In this session, we’ll talk about techniques for developers, traf c growth on downstream sites, and researcher engagement. We’ll look at examples of sites that consume VIVO and Pro les data and talk about what it’s like to share data across nearly 50 local websites and apps.
View presentationAnirvan Chatterjee , UCSF
This workshop is designed to help institutions build, leverage, and deploy the information within their RNS across the institution. The goal is to increase awareness of, engagement with and dependence on your RNS to solidify the RNS’ roles in supporting researchers. Note that the takeaways from this workshop can be applied to your RNS regardless of the underlying product, and will work for a VIVO, Pro les, “home grown,” or commercial RNS installation. This workshop will provide a mix of lecture, discussion, exercises, and templates to enable participants to replicate the successful engagement at UCSF — and avoid our biggest mistakes. Use of this approach has garnered 1.3 million visits a year, 2,800 customized pro les, and 38 outbound data reuse integrations for UCSF Pro les. This workshop will discuss ways to make your RNS indispensable in each phase of the implementation: Setting the Stage • Auto-added data: add as much data as possible to your RNS - publications, grants, photos, news stories, etc. • Google Analytics - the crucial substrate • Pre-packaging of publications, people and connections • APIs to make the data available • Targeting and messaging decision makers appropriately Dress Rehearsal • User support - answer the emails! • Senior leadership support • Deploy APIs to power other websites • Search engine optimization Opening Night & The Season • Engagement email campaigns • Bootcamps and department meetings • Finding and catering to the “power users” • Iterative process of growing user base/traf c and providing more data/features After Party • Wrapping it all up to show the value of your RNS in an executive level report for the higher administration
While multi-site search of research pro ling systems has substantially evolved in recent years, the deployed instances of pro ling systems substantially remain disconnected islands of Linked Open Data (LOD). CTSAsearch harvests VIVO-compliant LOD and provides a number of data integration services in addition to search and visualization services. Seventy- eight institutions are currently included, spanning nine distinct platforms. In aggregate, CTSAsearch has data on 168-415 thousand unique researchers and their 7 million publications. The public interface is available at http://research.icts.uiowa.edu/polyglot. This paper presents our experiences connecting CTSAsearch data integration services into the UCSF CrossLinks service, providing a means of directly interlinking researcher pro les across sites and platforms. Data Integration Services CTSAsearch integration services have been designed to support human exploration of the identity of pro led persons and automated linkage of LOD across systems. Services hence fall roughly along a human-system interface spectrum: Person by name query: This service accepts a last name and a rst name pre x and returns two discrete lists, one of “real” persons (i.e., pro les deemed as not stubs) and one of “stubs” (i.e., pro les appearing to only be placeholders in some pro ling system). The returned URIs can then be used as input for sameas queries below. Person by publication query: This service accepts a DOI or PMID and returns a list of pro led authors and their rank in the author list of the target publication. Output formats include HTML, JSON and XML. This service is speci cally designed to support inter-site linkage of coauthors. Person sameas query: This service accepts a person URI and returns a list of URIs referring to the same person. Currently, two URIs are asserted to refer to the same individual if they share one or more publications with the same PMID or DOI, have the same family name and either the same rst name or one rst name is a single initial that matches the rst name of the other. (All name comparisons are case insensitive.) Cross-linking Pro les Almost all research pro ling sites currently provide only internal links. In the case of extra-institutional co-authors, either no information is provided or stub pro les are generated containing only an author name generated from the citation. UCSF Pro les now harvests CTSASearch data to provide links to the non- institutional co-authors, and is working with Harvard to make this feature a part of the common Pro les RNS software. Bene ts arising from this feature include a richer web user experience, the ability to “crowd source” disambiguated data (an author at UCSF noticed a link to an incorrect author with a similar name at another institution, and has noti ed the administrators at the other institution), as well as improved SEO due to links from many top level domains. Conclusion CTSAsearch and CrossLinks demonstrate that substantial value can be added to the current research networking landscape through integration of these data. Our future work in this area will include enhanced ability to interconnect these systems and to visualize the resulting aggregated information space.
View presentationDuke and UCSF have come up with ways to make their research networking platforms indispensable at their institutions, winning friends and allies, and strengthening the case for renewed funding. Others can do this too — but only if we retro t VIVO, Pro les, and other platforms with simple data reuse mechanisms. In this session, we’ll talk about techniques for developers, traf c growth on downstream sites, and researcher engagement. We’ll look at examples of sites that consume VIVO and Pro les data and talk about what it’s like to share data across nearly 50 local websites and apps.
View presentationEric Meeks , UCSF
A frequent request from Duke faculty members is, 'Can I create a CV from Scholars@Duke?' Now we can say, 'Yes!' Last fall, the School of Medicine's Appointments, Promotions and Tenure Committee asked for a CV generator to help streamline dossier submissions as well as to encourage maintenance of Duke's VIVO implementation, Scholars@Duke. With the help of the APT committee and the VIVO widgets, users can generate (client- side) a simple CV in a Word document. The Scholars@Duke team is working to enhance the CV by adding a number of user-maintained elds. Phase two of the Scholars CV will take many months and a lot of development effort -- will the APT committee like it? And more importantly, will faculty use it? Get the inside scoop at this presentation.
View presentationDuke and UCSF have come up with ways to make their research networking platforms indispensable at their institutions, winning friends and allies, and strengthening the case for renewed funding. Others can do this too — but only if we retro t VIVO, Pro les, and other platforms with simple data reuse mechanisms. In this session, we’ll talk about techniques for developers, traf c growth on downstream sites, and researcher engagement. We’ll look at examples of sites that consume VIVO and Pro les data and talk about what it’s like to share data across nearly 50 local websites and apps.
View presentationRichard Outten ,
A frequent request from Duke faculty members is, 'Can I create a CV from Scholars@Duke?' Now we can say, 'Yes!' Last fall, the School of Medicine's Appointments, Promotions and Tenure Committee asked for a CV generator to help streamline dossier submissions as well as to encourage maintenance of Duke's VIVO implementation, Scholars@Duke. With the help of the APT committee and the VIVO widgets, users can generate (client- side) a simple CV in a Word document. The Scholars@Duke team is working to enhance the CV by adding a number of user-maintained elds. Phase two of the Scholars CV will take many months and a lot of development effort -- will the APT committee like it? And more importantly, will faculty use it? Get the inside scoop at this presentation.
View presentationGreg Burton , Duke
As an extension of the Linked Data for Libraries project (LD4L) and parallel work to integrate VIVO and SHARE, the Hesburgh Libraries at the University of Notre Dame is working to link Fedora 4, Hydra, VIVO, and SHARE together to further realize the paradigm proposed within LD4L with a focus on research lifecycle events. This project dubbed SHARE Link is focused towards two primary aims desired by many institutions: institution level research activity tracking, curation, and sharing; enhanced search, browse and discovery of research events and related materials. Subsequently, bringing SHARE, VIVO, and Fedora 4 together makes it possible to create a dashboard of research events including links to repository materials. In turn, the metadata in each system are enriched in ways not possible with any one solution. The underlying uni ed research and repository information graph (between Fedora and VIVO) will also allow browsing the virtual shelves of repository materials across venue, subject, and other person af nities like specialization, institution, or co-authors. It will allow creating a recommendation list when viewing a related work. While wider adoption within the Fedora community will be sought, this effort is initially focused on developing a reference implementation of VIVO paired with an Institutional Repository utilizing the Hydra Framework on top of Fedora 4. This presentation will describe progress to date in the early life of this project. It will explore the relevant use cases and reasons why the pairing of these solutions are stronger together than apart. It will also cover possible collaborations, the project timeline, and current and future goals such as: • Enhance serendipitous discovery of research materials. • Collect and display research activity by researchers at a given institution or within an academic department. • Create a widely accessible module for an institution to harness the SHARE data feed of broadly aggregated research events. • Create a compelling integration between SHARE, VIVO, and Fedora 4 that harnesses the strengths of each platform.
View presentationRick Johnson ,
A globally interconnected research world is the norm. This offers great opportunities for communication and collaboration across elds of research, but it also comes with great challenges, in particular for systems interoperability. Many technology products, systems and tools have been created to help universities and other research organizations meet these challenges while achieving their strategic goals. This is creating a new challenge: a confusing stack of technology for users to assemble into a functional research ecosystem. This panel will explore how one university, Texas A&M, selected and implemented a technology stack and is using it to achieve their strategic plan, “Vision 2020: Creating a Culture of Excellence.” Their stack includes: • VIVO • ORCID • Repositories, Vireo & DSpace • PlumX The panel will discuss the components and the interactions between them, to provide the audience concrete examples of a working, interconnected research ecosystem. Texas A&M will describe its process for de ning its technology needs, who was engaged, and the questions that drove decision- making. They will describe their current technology stack, and the connections between the components. One cross-platform connector used by Texas A&M is the ORCID ID, which is allowing them to integrate information about researcher works and af liations across various systems and present this information in their VIVO instance. ORCID will describe how ORCID identi ers are being used at universities to assert researcher af liation, and how universities may bene t from integrations by publishers and funders. Consortia approaches to implementation and adoption will be discussed, as well as the use of ORCID in federated identity management systems such as eduGAIN, and how ORCID interacts with identi ers for works and organizations. Green open-access institutional repositories are a key component of a research ecosystem. It is the container for the research output conducted at the university. Recent studies have shown that opening up access to research creates more usage and citations for that research. Texas A&M implemented Vireo for theses and dissertations and DSpace for faculty research. How is all of this enabling Texas A&M to measure progress toward its strategic goals? As a component of its tech stack, Texas A&M has integrated PlumX to track research metrics in ve categories: usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations. Sometimes this is referred to as altmetrics. This part of the panel will include a discussion of what Texas A&M has discovered by tracking metrics across disciplines including output for the humanities. It will also showcase some other use cases of metrics in institutional repositories, analytics reports and researcher dashboards.
View presentationBruce Herbert ,
A globally interconnected research world is the norm. This offers great opportunities for communication and collaboration across elds of research, but it also comes with great challenges, in particular for systems interoperability. Many technology products, systems and tools have been created to help universities and other research organizations meet these challenges while achieving their strategic goals. This is creating a new challenge: a confusing stack of technology for users to assemble into a functional research ecosystem. This panel will explore how one university, Texas A&M, selected and implemented a technology stack and is using it to achieve their strategic plan, “Vision 2020: Creating a Culture of Excellence.” Their stack includes: • VIVO • ORCID • Repositories, Vireo & DSpace • PlumX The panel will discuss the components and the interactions between them, to provide the audience concrete examples of a working, interconnected research ecosystem. Texas A&M will describe its process for de ning its technology needs, who was engaged, and the questions that drove decision- making. They will describe their current technology stack, and the connections between the components. One cross-platform connector used by Texas A&M is the ORCID ID, which is allowing them to integrate information about researcher works and af liations across various systems and present this information in their VIVO instance. ORCID will describe how ORCID identi ers are being used at universities to assert researcher af liation, and how universities may bene t from integrations by publishers and funders. Consortia approaches to implementation and adoption will be discussed, as well as the use of ORCID in federated identity management systems such as eduGAIN, and how ORCID interacts with identi ers for works and organizations. Green open-access institutional repositories are a key component of a research ecosystem. It is the container for the research output conducted at the university. Recent studies have shown that opening up access to research creates more usage and citations for that research. Texas A&M implemented Vireo for theses and dissertations and DSpace for faculty research. How is all of this enabling Texas A&M to measure progress toward its strategic goals? As a component of its tech stack, Texas A&M has integrated PlumX to track research metrics in ve categories: usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations. Sometimes this is referred to as altmetrics. This part of the panel will include a discussion of what Texas A&M has discovered by tracking metrics across disciplines including output for the humanities. It will also showcase some other use cases of metrics in institutional repositories, analytics reports and researcher dashboards.
View presentationAndrea Michalek ,
A globally interconnected research world is the norm. This offers great opportunities for communication and collaboration across elds of research, but it also comes with great challenges, in particular for systems interoperability. Many technology products, systems and tools have been created to help universities and other research organizations meet these challenges while achieving their strategic goals. This is creating a new challenge: a confusing stack of technology for users to assemble into a functional research ecosystem. This panel will explore how one university, Texas A&M, selected and implemented a technology stack and is using it to achieve their strategic plan, “Vision 2020: Creating a Culture of Excellence.” Their stack includes: • VIVO • ORCID • Repositories, Vireo & DSpace • PlumX The panel will discuss the components and the interactions between them, to provide the audience concrete examples of a working, interconnected research ecosystem. Texas A&M will describe its process for de ning its technology needs, who was engaged, and the questions that drove decision- making. They will describe their current technology stack, and the connections between the components. One cross-platform connector used by Texas A&M is the ORCID ID, which is allowing them to integrate information about researcher works and af liations across various systems and present this information in their VIVO instance. ORCID will describe how ORCID identi ers are being used at universities to assert researcher af liation, and how universities may bene t from integrations by publishers and funders. Consortia approaches to implementation and adoption will be discussed, as well as the use of ORCID in federated identity management systems such as eduGAIN, and how ORCID interacts with identi ers for works and organizations. Green open-access institutional repositories are a key component of a research ecosystem. It is the container for the research output conducted at the university. Recent studies have shown that opening up access to research creates more usage and citations for that research. Texas A&M implemented Vireo for theses and dissertations and DSpace for faculty research. How is all of this enabling Texas A&M to measure progress toward its strategic goals? As a component of its tech stack, Texas A&M has integrated PlumX to track research metrics in ve categories: usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations. Sometimes this is referred to as altmetrics. This part of the panel will include a discussion of what Texas A&M has discovered by tracking metrics across disciplines including output for the humanities. It will also showcase some other use cases of metrics in institutional repositories, analytics reports and researcher dashboards.
View presentationMarianne Parkhill ,
Administration at Weill Cornell Medicine has called upon the Library to track authorship for thousands of individuals including faculty, postdocs, and alumni. Until identi ers like ORCID are adopted more widely and used more consistently, author disambiguation remains an important challenge towards producing valid and real-time reports of publication activity. At the 2015 VIVO Conference, we presented ReCiter, a Java-based tool which uses institutionally-maintained data to perform author name disambiguation in PubMed. Since last year’s conference we have continued to improve the performance of ReCiter. In our set of 63 randomly selected existing faculty members, ReCiter can now assert author identity at over 97% accuracy. In a randomly selected sample of 20 alumni, ReCiter performed at 93% accuracy, and, for active students this gure was 80%. ReCiter employs 15 separate strategies for disambiguation. The range of data used spans six systems of records: Of ce of Faculty Affairs, Human Resources, alumni database, student database, physician pro le system, and the grants management system. For our test set of data, we have established which data are most powerful in contributing to overall accuracy. These include: known co- investigators, known department, and year of doctoral degree. Our team has designed ReCiter to be generalizable. Our goal is to determine if the high accuracy we note can be achieved at other sites. The code will be shared with the community.
View presentationMany metrics may be used to evaluate a researcher’s scholarly impact. Because research articles are a prominent currency of academic scholarship, citation impact plays a central role in scholarly impact assessment. Times cited data are highly skewed, and it is well recognized in the bibliometrics literature that nonparametric approaches are appropriate for skewed distributions. By convention in bibliometrics the scholarly impact of an article is assessed against a reference set of other articles of the same publication type (i.e. academic article or review), in the same eld, and published the same year. The articles in the reference set are used as a baseline to calculate the percentile rank of the number of times a given article has been cited. To our knowledge, no currently available systems are capable of displaying article-level impact based on percentile rank of times cited for the entire percentile distribution. To support research impact assessment, we have developed the Citation Impact Tool, an interactive component of VIVO Dashboard. The system allows users to assess the percentile rank of the number of citations speci c articles have received relative to peer publications. Publications are individually benchmarked against reference sets of 200 articles of the same type, topical category of journal, and year of publication. Times cited data comes from Elsevier’s Scopus. The system uses an iconographic bar chart to portray article-level citation impact of multiple articles in one view, and allows users to lter by type of article, author order ( rst/last author rank), and topical category. The system uses Thomson Reuters Web of Science journal categories to assign articles to individual elds. When an article is in more than one category, the percentile rank of times cited is calculated separately against a separate reference set of articles for each category. A mean percentile rank for the article across categories is then calculated and, in turn, used in the bar chart. Because recently published articles have had little time to accumulate citations, articles from the past two to three years are deliberately excluded from the charts. The code will be shared with the community
View presentationMichael Bales ,
Administration at Weill Cornell Medicine has called upon the Library to track authorship for thousands of individuals including faculty, postdocs, and alumni. Until identi ers like ORCID are adopted more widely and used more consistently, author disambiguation remains an important challenge towards producing valid and real-time reports of publication activity. At the 2015 VIVO Conference, we presented ReCiter, a Java-based tool which uses institutionally-maintained data to perform author name disambiguation in PubMed. Since last year’s conference we have continued to improve the performance of ReCiter. In our set of 63 randomly selected existing faculty members, ReCiter can now assert author identity at over 97% accuracy. In a randomly selected sample of 20 alumni, ReCiter performed at 93% accuracy, and, for active students this gure was 80%. ReCiter employs 15 separate strategies for disambiguation. The range of data used spans six systems of records: Of ce of Faculty Affairs, Human Resources, alumni database, student database, physician pro le system, and the grants management system. For our test set of data, we have established which data are most powerful in contributing to overall accuracy. These include: known co- investigators, known department, and year of doctoral degree. Our team has designed ReCiter to be generalizable. Our goal is to determine if the high accuracy we note can be achieved at other sites. The code will be shared with the community.
View presentationJie Lin ,
Administration at Weill Cornell Medicine has called upon the Library to track authorship for thousands of individuals including faculty, postdocs, and alumni. Until identi ers like ORCID are adopted more widely and used more consistently, author disambiguation remains an important challenge towards producing valid and real-time reports of publication activity. At the 2015 VIVO Conference, we presented ReCiter, a Java-based tool which uses institutionally-maintained data to perform author name disambiguation in PubMed. Since last year’s conference we have continued to improve the performance of ReCiter. In our set of 63 randomly selected existing faculty members, ReCiter can now assert author identity at over 97% accuracy. In a randomly selected sample of 20 alumni, ReCiter performed at 93% accuracy, and, for active students this gure was 80%. ReCiter employs 15 separate strategies for disambiguation. The range of data used spans six systems of records: Of ce of Faculty Affairs, Human Resources, alumni database, student database, physician pro le system, and the grants management system. For our test set of data, we have established which data are most powerful in contributing to overall accuracy. These include: known co- investigators, known department, and year of doctoral degree. Our team has designed ReCiter to be generalizable. Our goal is to determine if the high accuracy we note can be achieved at other sites. The code will be shared with the community.
View presentationSteve Johnson ,
VIVO implementations have long been closely tied to the library and yet local VIVO systems have prioritized the integration of institutional repository data far below other internal or external data sources, thereby bypassing the local infrastructure designed to preserve institutional research for a university. A new partnership between the University of Florida (UF) George A. Smathers Libraries and Elsevier makes the UF Institutional Repository (IR@UF) an excellent internal data source for UF author publications. As background, in 2014 and 2015 the Smathers Libraries and Elsevier embarked on a bilateral pilot project that identi ed and collected metadata for over 30,000 articles written by UF staff, faculty and students and published by Elsevier from 1949 forward. The Smathers Libraries are placing the metadata and full-text into the IR@UF for indexing with the full text document available through the Elsevier ScienceDirect platform for supported aggregated metrics and article tracking. The partnership between Elsevier and the Smathers Libraries is a natural choice as Elsevier has a large volume of content and a high citation impact and UF authors publish 1,100-1,300 articles per year in Elsevier journals. This bilateral partnership is now being expanded to include other publishers through CHORUS -- a non-pro t cooperative effort involving publishers and funding agencies to expand access to scholarly publications reporting on funded research— designed to provide high-quality citation information as a tool to support reporting compliance through an alerting and reporting dashboard integrated with the IR@UF. CHORUS is developing a compliance dashboard for integration with the IR@UF and other academic institutional repository systems. The overall goals of this project are for the Libraries to provide an infrastructure to assist with researcher compliance, provide CHORUS and the participating publishers a better understanding of the information needed by institutional repositories for tracking and reporting on compliance, and further increase discoverability of scholarship through potential linkages with VIVO@UF. This presentation will give an overview of how embargo periods will be handed and accessibility addressed when a user does not have access to subscribed content, and will also outline the bene ts of the partnership which includes reduced faculty burden, facilitated compliance reporting, increased visibility and accessibility, and additional institutional linkages supporting contextualization of research.
View presentationValrie Minson ,
VIVO implementations have long been closely tied to the library and yet local VIVO systems have prioritized the integration of institutional repository data far below other internal or external data sources, thereby bypassing the local infrastructure designed to preserve institutional research for a university. A new partnership between the University of Florida (UF) George A. Smathers Libraries and Elsevier makes the UF Institutional Repository (IR@UF) an excellent internal data source for UF author publications. As background, in 2014 and 2015 the Smathers Libraries and Elsevier embarked on a bilateral pilot project that identi ed and collected metadata for over 30,000 articles written by UF staff, faculty and students and published by Elsevier from 1949 forward. The Smathers Libraries are placing the metadata and full-text into the IR@UF for indexing with the full text document available through the Elsevier ScienceDirect platform for supported aggregated metrics and article tracking. The partnership between Elsevier and the Smathers Libraries is a natural choice as Elsevier has a large volume of content and a high citation impact and UF authors publish 1,100-1,300 articles per year in Elsevier journals. This bilateral partnership is now being expanded to include other publishers through CHORUS -- a non-pro t cooperative effort involving publishers and funding agencies to expand access to scholarly publications reporting on funded research— designed to provide high-quality citation information as a tool to support reporting compliance through an alerting and reporting dashboard integrated with the IR@UF. CHORUS is developing a compliance dashboard for integration with the IR@UF and other academic institutional repository systems. The overall goals of this project are for the Libraries to provide an infrastructure to assist with researcher compliance, provide CHORUS and the participating publishers a better understanding of the information needed by institutional repositories for tracking and reporting on compliance, and further increase discoverability of scholarship through potential linkages with VIVO@UF. This presentation will give an overview of how embargo periods will be handed and accessibility addressed when a user does not have access to subscribed content, and will also outline the bene ts of the partnership which includes reduced faculty burden, facilitated compliance reporting, increased visibility and accessibility, and additional institutional linkages supporting contextualization of research.
View presentationSara Gonzalez ,
VIVO implementations have long been closely tied to the library and yet local VIVO systems have prioritized the integration of institutional repository data far below other internal or external data sources, thereby bypassing the local infrastructure designed to preserve institutional research for a university. A new partnership between the University of Florida (UF) George A. Smathers Libraries and Elsevier makes the UF Institutional Repository (IR@UF) an excellent internal data source for UF author publications. As background, in 2014 and 2015 the Smathers Libraries and Elsevier embarked on a bilateral pilot project that identi ed and collected metadata for over 30,000 articles written by UF staff, faculty and students and published by Elsevier from 1949 forward. The Smathers Libraries are placing the metadata and full-text into the IR@UF for indexing with the full text document available through the Elsevier ScienceDirect platform for supported aggregated metrics and article tracking. The partnership between Elsevier and the Smathers Libraries is a natural choice as Elsevier has a large volume of content and a high citation impact and UF authors publish 1,100-1,300 articles per year in Elsevier journals. This bilateral partnership is now being expanded to include other publishers through CHORUS -- a non-pro t cooperative effort involving publishers and funding agencies to expand access to scholarly publications reporting on funded research— designed to provide high-quality citation information as a tool to support reporting compliance through an alerting and reporting dashboard integrated with the IR@UF. CHORUS is developing a compliance dashboard for integration with the IR@UF and other academic institutional repository systems. The overall goals of this project are for the Libraries to provide an infrastructure to assist with researcher compliance, provide CHORUS and the participating publishers a better understanding of the information needed by institutional repositories for tracking and reporting on compliance, and further increase discoverability of scholarship through potential linkages with VIVO@UF. This presentation will give an overview of how embargo periods will be handed and accessibility addressed when a user does not have access to subscribed content, and will also outline the bene ts of the partnership which includes reduced faculty burden, facilitated compliance reporting, increased visibility and accessibility, and additional institutional linkages supporting contextualization of research.
View presentationJudith Russell ,
Ask a researcher to populate an institutional webpage and you’ll see them roll their eyes and move on to something more enjoyable. Ask a researcher to complete their faculty activity report and they'll grudgingly do it, but complain about the duplicated effort. However: ask a researcher to keep a system up-to-date throughout the year, so that they can avoid the annual form- lling common with other systems, and they might not only do it, but tell their colleagues about how easy it was! One of the core concepts behind Symplectic’s mission is the reduction of the administrative burden from research institutions and their staff. The next logical step in this calling is the tackling of faculty activity and performance- related assessments: parts of a much larger data-gathering exercise that institutions partake in every year and one that remains laborious to all required to contribute. The latest major release of Elements, Symplectic’s leading Research Information Management System, contained a highly- anticipated solution to this issue - the Assessment Module. Assessment-related data can now be reused, repurposed, and resurfaced on a VIVO pro le, with researchers having the freedom to pick what’s pertinent for public use. This presentation will explore how this module offers a signi cant new repurpose of institutional data. Complementing our long- standing relationship with VIVO, Symplectic is continually committed to semantically linking previously siloed data; knowing that this data is only useful when it can be reused throughout an institution freeing faculty from burdensome reentry.
View presentationJonathan Breeze , Symplectic
Ask a researcher to populate an institutional webpage and you’ll see them roll their eyes and move on to something more enjoyable. Ask a researcher to complete their faculty activity report and they'll grudgingly do it, but complain about the duplicated effort. However: ask a researcher to keep a system up-to-date throughout the year, so that they can avoid the annual form- lling common with other systems, and they might not only do it, but tell their colleagues about how easy it was! One of the core concepts behind Symplectic’s mission is the reduction of the administrative burden from research institutions and their staff. The next logical step in this calling is the tackling of faculty activity and performance- related assessments: parts of a much larger data-gathering exercise that institutions partake in every year and one that remains laborious to all required to contribute. The latest major release of Elements, Symplectic’s leading Research Information Management System, contained a highly- anticipated solution to this issue - the Assessment Module. Assessment-related data can now be reused, repurposed, and resurfaced on a VIVO pro le, with researchers having the freedom to pick what’s pertinent for public use. This presentation will explore how this module offers a signi cant new repurpose of institutional data. Complementing our long- standing relationship with VIVO, Symplectic is continually committed to semantically linking previously siloed data; knowing that this data is only useful when it can be reused throughout an institution freeing faculty from burdensome reentry.
View presentationJeff Dougherty , Symplectic
Ask a researcher to populate an institutional webpage and you’ll see them roll their eyes and move on to something more enjoyable. Ask a researcher to complete their faculty activity report and they'll grudgingly do it, but complain about the duplicated effort. However: ask a researcher to keep a system up-to-date throughout the year, so that they can avoid the annual form- lling common with other systems, and they might not only do it, but tell their colleagues about how easy it was! One of the core concepts behind Symplectic’s mission is the reduction of the administrative burden from research institutions and their staff. The next logical step in this calling is the tackling of faculty activity and performance- related assessments: parts of a much larger data-gathering exercise that institutions partake in every year and one that remains laborious to all required to contribute. The latest major release of Elements, Symplectic’s leading Research Information Management System, contained a highly- anticipated solution to this issue - the Assessment Module. Assessment-related data can now be reused, repurposed, and resurfaced on a VIVO pro le, with researchers having the freedom to pick what’s pertinent for public use. This presentation will explore how this module offers a signi cant new repurpose of institutional data. Complementing our long- standing relationship with VIVO, Symplectic is continually committed to semantically linking previously siloed data; knowing that this data is only useful when it can be reused throughout an institution freeing faculty from burdensome reentry.
View presentationOver the past few years, VIVO has gained global appeal amongst institutions. However, many institutions struggle to get past the early adopter phase and ‘go live’ with their own VIVO. As Registered Service Providers of VIVO, we are often asked for ‘showcase’ VIVO systems to display. We will typically send them examples where institutions have undertaken large customisation projects on top their VIVO, like Grif th University. Institutions who adopt VIVO still struggle to nd a focus for the ‘stock’ version. For it to be an effective showcase of an institution’s data, there needs to be consideration of usability and design to realise its full potential, to make it a true centre of the expertise of an institution. Many institutions do not always have the resource or expertise to achieve this.
View presentationAs the rst of cial DuraSpace Registered Service Provider for VIVO, Symplectic provides services that cover everything from installation, to support of VIVO on client servers, to providing our own hosted solution. Our continued involvement in user groups, the DuraSpace community and participation in VIVO working groups mean that we are well placed to support the needs of the VIVO community. Symplectic is also a registered service provider for Pro les RNS, the open source Semantic Web research networking platform based on the VIVO ontology. This presentation will re ect on Symplectic’s second year as a Registered Service Provider, showcasing the projects we have supported for both VIVO and Pro les RNS, including institutions outside the US - covering installations, data analysis, data population, customisation, and hosting. As well as our current engagements, we will introduce a number of new initiatives we plan to introduce in support of both open source communities.
Michael Metcalf , Symplectic
Over the past few years, VIVO has gained global appeal amongst institutions. However, many institutions struggle to get past the early adopter phase and ‘go live’ with their own VIVO. As Registered Service Providers of VIVO, we are often asked for ‘showcase’ VIVO systems to display. We will typically send them examples where institutions have undertaken large customisation projects on top their VIVO, like Grif th University. Institutions who adopt VIVO still struggle to nd a focus for the ‘stock’ version. For it to be an effective showcase of an institution’s data, there needs to be consideration of usability and design to realise its full potential, to make it a true centre of the expertise of an institution. Many institutions do not always have the resource or expertise to achieve this.
View presentationSabih Ali , Symplectic
As the rst of cial DuraSpace Registered Service Provider for VIVO, Symplectic provides services that cover everything from installation, to support of VIVO on client servers, to providing our own hosted solution. Our continued involvement in user groups, the DuraSpace community and participation in VIVO working groups mean that we are well placed to support the needs of the VIVO community. Symplectic is also a registered service provider for Pro les RNS, the open source Semantic Web research networking platform based on the VIVO ontology. This presentation will re ect on Symplectic’s second year as a Registered Service Provider, showcasing the projects we have supported for both VIVO and Pro les RNS, including institutions outside the US - covering installations, data analysis, data population, customisation, and hosting. As well as our current engagements, we will introduce a number of new initiatives we plan to introduce in support of both open source communities.
Julia Hawks , Symplectic
As the rst of cial DuraSpace Registered Service Provider for VIVO, Symplectic provides services that cover everything from installation, to support of VIVO on client servers, to providing our own hosted solution. Our continued involvement in user groups, the DuraSpace community and participation in VIVO working groups mean that we are well placed to support the needs of the VIVO community. Symplectic is also a registered service provider for Pro les RNS, the open source Semantic Web research networking platform based on the VIVO ontology. This presentation will re ect on Symplectic’s second year as a Registered Service Provider, showcasing the projects we have supported for both VIVO and Pro les RNS, including institutions outside the US - covering installations, data analysis, data population, customisation, and hosting. As well as our current engagements, we will introduce a number of new initiatives we plan to introduce in support of both open source communities.
John Gieschen , Symplectic
The VIVO Pump is a new tool for managing data in VIVO. The Pump allows data to be managed in spreadsheets -- simple rows and columns corresponding to attributes of entities in VIVO. Using the Pump, a data manager can 'get' data from VIVO into a spreadsheet, modify the values, and/or add rows, and then 'update' VIVO using the improved spreadsheet. Enterprise data can be loaded into VIVO using and update from a spreadsheet. The Pump uses de nition les in JSON format to de ne the mapping between spreadsheet rows and columns, and VIVO's graph data models. De nition les are included with the Pump for managing people, positions, educational background, organizations, publications, grants, teaching, service, mentoring, dates, journals and concepts. No knowledge of the VIVO ontology is required to use delivered de nition les. De nition les are used to 'round trip' data -- the same de nition is used to perform the 'get' as to perform the 'update.' The Pump can be used to load data to new VIVOs as well as for managing data of established VIVOs. Additional features of the Pump include 'enumerations' -- simple translation tables that allow the Pump to convert between terminologies and identi ers, and 'filters' which can be assigned to columns to perform routine standardization of values. The Pump is completely domain agnostic. De nition les can be created for any set of ontologies to manage any graph data as spreadsheets. In this talk, we will describe the design goals of the Pump and provide examples of its use to manage data in VIVO. The Pump is fully documented in on-line resources, as well as PDF and eBook formats. The Pump is open source software, made freely available under the Apache License.
View presentationThis talk will focus on a publications data enrichment project at the University of Florida. We will describe how the team has utilized web services from the Web of ScienceTM to automate processes and to add unique identi ers to existing publications. We will also explain modi cations to VIVO’s core queries and templates that allow for adding important contextual links to VIVO, which enhance browsing and discovery. Data processing code, methods and lessons learned will be shared with attendees.
View presentationChristopher Barnes ,
The VIVO Pump is a new tool for managing data in VIVO. The Pump allows data to be managed in spreadsheets -- simple rows and columns corresponding to attributes of entities in VIVO. Using the Pump, a data manager can 'get' data from VIVO into a spreadsheet, modify the values, and/or add rows, and then 'update' VIVO using the improved spreadsheet. Enterprise data can be loaded into VIVO using and update from a spreadsheet. The Pump uses de nition les in JSON format to de ne the mapping between spreadsheet rows and columns, and VIVO's graph data models. De nition les are included with the Pump for managing people, positions, educational background, organizations, publications, grants, teaching, service, mentoring, dates, journals and concepts. No knowledge of the VIVO ontology is required to use delivered de nition les. De nition les are used to 'round trip' data -- the same de nition is used to perform the 'get' as to perform the 'update.' The Pump can be used to load data to new VIVOs as well as for managing data of established VIVOs. Additional features of the Pump include 'enumerations' -- simple translation tables that allow the Pump to convert between terminologies and identi ers, and 'filters' which can be assigned to columns to perform routine standardization of values. The Pump is completely domain agnostic. De nition les can be created for any set of ontologies to manage any graph data as spreadsheets. In this talk, we will describe the design goals of the Pump and provide examples of its use to manage data in VIVO. The Pump is fully documented in on-line resources, as well as PDF and eBook formats. The Pump is open source software, made freely available under the Apache License.
View presentationThis talk will focus on a publications data enrichment project at the University of Florida. We will describe how the team has utilized web services from the Web of ScienceTM to automate processes and to add unique identi ers to existing publications. We will also explain modi cations to VIVO’s core queries and templates that allow for adding important contextual links to VIVO, which enhance browsing and discovery. Data processing code, methods and lessons learned will be shared with attendees.
View presentationKevin Hanson ,
A number of commercially developed publication databases such as Web of Science and Google Scholar aim to provide a comprehensive view of the scholarly literature. Such databases are quite large in scale, needing to handle metadata on the order of about 100 million publications, and to grow by more than 1 million new publication records every year. There is ongoing interest in creating more open comprehensive databases in the community as well, for various purposes, ranging from open access support to preservation to various kinds of researcher analysis. Is it worth creating and supporting such open databases in the community, and if so, for what purposes? How could they scale up as they would need to, in technical, political, and participatory terms? How could they use cooperation to thrive, rather than being starved as unwanted competition? What can we learn from experiences with existing and proposed comprehensive and specialized publication knowledge bases, whether run by commercial rms, academic institutions, interested amateurs, or bootleggers? How could VIVO sites help build up comprehensive publication databases, and how would the availability of such databases affect the sort of data and services that local VIVO sites would focus on? The goal of this session is not to propose Yet Another Big Database for the VIVO community to develop, but rather to provoke discussions on how efforts in the VIVO community can best support and take advantage of a growing ecosystem of open publication data, at the global scale.
View presentationJohn Mark Ockerbloom ,
The federal government tackles America’s hardest problems; yielding decisions with important consequences for our nation’s future. Thomson Reuters recently named the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as the most innovative publically- funded research organization in the U.S., and fourth in the world. The challenges we face are worthy of mobilizing our nation’s best minds across multiple sectors. And yet we lack a systematic way to locate and match expertise for participatory problem-solving. The question of how best to leverage collective intelligence for better governance remains unanswered. In 2015, expert networking implementers from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) forged a collaboration to launch the HHS Pro les pilot. Funded by 18F, General Services Administration (GSA), the goal was to test the viability of a public-facing, multiorganizational expertise matching platform called “HHS Pro les.” The team presented the project plan at the VIVO 2015 Conference, and returns to report preliminary results and lessons learned from this effort to design a platform-agnostic, integrated framework to harness intra-government expertise. We will then discuss the scope and requirements of the next project phase, and the vision for “HHS Pro les” scales to “Experts. gov.” The presentation will close with a re ection on future pathways for cross-sector collaboration, and address the unique challenges to expert discovery in the federal space
View presentationJames King ,
The federal government tackles America’s hardest problems; yielding decisions with important consequences for our nation’s future. Thomson Reuters recently named the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as the most innovative publically- funded research organization in the U.S., and fourth in the world. The challenges we face are worthy of mobilizing our nation’s best minds across multiple sectors. And yet we lack a systematic way to locate and match expertise for participatory problem-solving. The question of how best to leverage collective intelligence for better governance remains unanswered. In 2015, expert networking implementers from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) forged a collaboration to launch the HHS Pro les pilot. Funded by 18F, General Services Administration (GSA), the goal was to test the viability of a public-facing, multiorganizational expertise matching platform called “HHS Pro les.” The team presented the project plan at the VIVO 2015 Conference, and returns to report preliminary results and lessons learned from this effort to design a platform-agnostic, integrated framework to harness intra-government expertise. We will then discuss the scope and requirements of the next project phase, and the vision for “HHS Pro les” scales to “Experts. gov.” The presentation will close with a re ection on future pathways for cross-sector collaboration, and address the unique challenges to expert discovery in the federal space
View presentationJessica Hernandez Berrellez ,
The federal government tackles America’s hardest problems; yielding decisions with important consequences for our nation’s future. Thomson Reuters recently named the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as the most innovative publically- funded research organization in the U.S., and fourth in the world. The challenges we face are worthy of mobilizing our nation’s best minds across multiple sectors. And yet we lack a systematic way to locate and match expertise for participatory problem-solving. The question of how best to leverage collective intelligence for better governance remains unanswered. In 2015, expert networking implementers from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) forged a collaboration to launch the HHS Pro les pilot. Funded by 18F, General Services Administration (GSA), the goal was to test the viability of a public-facing, multiorganizational expertise matching platform called “HHS Pro les.” The team presented the project plan at the VIVO 2015 Conference, and returns to report preliminary results and lessons learned from this effort to design a platform-agnostic, integrated framework to harness intra-government expertise. We will then discuss the scope and requirements of the next project phase, and the vision for “HHS Pro les” scales to “Experts. gov.” The presentation will close with a re ection on future pathways for cross-sector collaboration, and address the unique challenges to expert discovery in the federal space
View presentationNichole Rosamilia ,
The federal government tackles America’s hardest problems; yielding decisions with important consequences for our nation’s future. Thomson Reuters recently named the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as the most innovative publically- funded research organization in the U.S., and fourth in the world. The challenges we face are worthy of mobilizing our nation’s best minds across multiple sectors. And yet we lack a systematic way to locate and match expertise for participatory problem-solving. The question of how best to leverage collective intelligence for better governance remains unanswered. In 2015, expert networking implementers from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) forged a collaboration to launch the HHS Pro les pilot. Funded by 18F, General Services Administration (GSA), the goal was to test the viability of a public-facing, multiorganizational expertise matching platform called “HHS Pro les.” The team presented the project plan at the VIVO 2015 Conference, and returns to report preliminary results and lessons learned from this effort to design a platform-agnostic, integrated framework to harness intra-government expertise. We will then discuss the scope and requirements of the next project phase, and the vision for “HHS Pro les” scales to “Experts. gov.” The presentation will close with a re ection on future pathways for cross-sector collaboration, and address the unique challenges to expert discovery in the federal space
View presentationBen Hope ,
The federal government tackles America’s hardest problems; yielding decisions with important consequences for our nation’s future. Thomson Reuters recently named the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as the most innovative publically- funded research organization in the U.S., and fourth in the world. The challenges we face are worthy of mobilizing our nation’s best minds across multiple sectors. And yet we lack a systematic way to locate and match expertise for participatory problem-solving. The question of how best to leverage collective intelligence for better governance remains unanswered. In 2015, expert networking implementers from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) forged a collaboration to launch the HHS Pro les pilot. Funded by 18F, General Services Administration (GSA), the goal was to test the viability of a public-facing, multiorganizational expertise matching platform called “HHS Pro les.” The team presented the project plan at the VIVO 2015 Conference, and returns to report preliminary results and lessons learned from this effort to design a platform-agnostic, integrated framework to harness intra-government expertise. We will then discuss the scope and requirements of the next project phase, and the vision for “HHS Pro les” scales to “Experts. gov.” The presentation will close with a re ection on future pathways for cross-sector collaboration, and address the unique challenges to expert discovery in the federal space
View presentationMashana Davis ,
The federal government tackles America’s hardest problems; yielding decisions with important consequences for our nation’s future. Thomson Reuters recently named the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as the most innovative publically- funded research organization in the U.S., and fourth in the world. The challenges we face are worthy of mobilizing our nation’s best minds across multiple sectors. And yet we lack a systematic way to locate and match expertise for participatory problem-solving. The question of how best to leverage collective intelligence for better governance remains unanswered. In 2015, expert networking implementers from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) forged a collaboration to launch the HHS Pro les pilot. Funded by 18F, General Services Administration (GSA), the goal was to test the viability of a public-facing, multiorganizational expertise matching platform called “HHS Pro les.” The team presented the project plan at the VIVO 2015 Conference, and returns to report preliminary results and lessons learned from this effort to design a platform-agnostic, integrated framework to harness intra-government expertise. We will then discuss the scope and requirements of the next project phase, and the vision for “HHS Pro les” scales to “Experts. gov.” The presentation will close with a re ection on future pathways for cross-sector collaboration, and address the unique challenges to expert discovery in the federal space
View presentationBridget Burns ,
This talk will focus on a publications data enrichment project at the University of Florida. We will describe how the team has utilized web services from the Web of ScienceTM to automate processes and to add unique identi ers to existing publications. We will also explain modi cations to VIVO’s core queries and templates that allow for adding important contextual links to VIVO, which enhance browsing and discovery. Data processing code, methods and lessons learned will be shared with attendees.
View presentationAfter deploying VIVO, adopters will nd that, overtime, data can become inconsistent, incomplete, or missing. This talk will focus on methods for identifying and resolving problematic data in an automated fashion. We will describe a reusable toolkit we have developed that utilizes SPARQL based rules for identifying data and VIVO's SPARQL API for updating, or correcting, these problems. Further, we will explain how web services are used to augment incomplete data. The toolkit and methods used will be extendable and reusable by other sites.
VIVO's rich data model can be ideal for publishing information about research activity and making connections among these activities. However the technical architecture can be a challenge to deploy as a public facing website for potential adopters. This talk will describe a process for building a research discovery website from VIVO's data model but deployed as a static site, using just HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. This talk will identify the data mapping process, publishing steps, lessons learned, and identify future directions of pursuit.
View presentationTed Lawless , Thomson Reuters
This talk will focus on a publications data enrichment project at the University of Florida. We will describe how the team has utilized web services from the Web of ScienceTM to automate processes and to add unique identi ers to existing publications. We will also explain modi cations to VIVO’s core queries and templates that allow for adding important contextual links to VIVO, which enhance browsing and discovery. Data processing code, methods and lessons learned will be shared with attendees.
View presentationNicholas Rejack ,
The Linked Data for Libraries (LD4L) team, consisting of librarians, ontologists, metadata experts, and developers from Cornell, Harvard, and Stanford libraries with support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, has recently completed its rst two years of work on adapting and developing LOD standards for describing and sharing information about scholarly information resources. In this presentation, we will describe how to access and use the LOD created by the project, representing some 29 million scholarly information resources cataloged by the three partner institutions. We will also describe the demonstration Blacklight search operating over the combined dataset. We will then describe the follow-on work currently underway in two closely related efforts. LD4L Labs is a partnership of Cornell, Harvard, Iowa, and Stanford focused on creating tools to support original cataloging of scholarly information resources using linked data, as well as tools to support using linked data to organize, annotate, visualize, browse, and discover these resources. The LD4P (Linked Data for metadata Production) project is a partnership of Stanford, Columbia, Cornell, Princeton, Harvard, and the Library of Congress to do original and copy cataloging of a wide range of collections and materials, including unique collections of Hip-Hop LPs, performed music, cartographic materials, audiovisual and sound recordings, two and three-dimensional art objects, and the personal library of a famous author and scholar. Finally, we will draw on the use cases and examples embodied in this work to discuss some of the opportunities to engage directly with VIVO pro les, the VIVO community, and the broader researcher pro ling ecosystem. Several of the efforts within LD4L Labs and LD4P will be looking at using VIVO pro les as local authorities during the process of cataloging scholarly resources. There are also potential opportunities for VIVO instances to take advantage of some of the ontology re nements that LD4L uses in describing scholarly works. We will explore some of the implications that these developments might have for how VIVO is used and evolves at academic institutions.
View presentationScience, data, and research products are the focus of two new VIVO implementations, Connect UNAVCO (connect.unavco.org) and EOL Arctic Data Connects (vivo.eol.ucar.edu). The sites are being developed as part of EarthCollab, a project funded by The National Science Foundation. EarthCollab is a collaboration between UNAVCO, the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and Cornell University. UNAVCO is a non-pro t university- governed consortium that facilitates geoscience research and education using geodesy. NCAR’s Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL) manages observational data related to a broad range of research elds in the geosciences. Both organizations support a large community of researchers and collaborators, many of them at U.S. and international universities. VIVO, with the science-focused application and ontology extensions we are developing, connects the research output of our diverse communities with datasets, grants, and instruments managed by our organizations. Unique identi ers for people (i.e., ORCID), publications (i.e. publication DOIs), data (i.e. data DOIs) are included whenever possible to avoid confusion and to yield the most stable and effective connections. To date, Connect UNAVCO includes active pages for 650+ community members. The members are connected to 4000+ academic articles, 3,800+ datasets, and 3,600+ GPS stations managed by UNAVCO. The VIVO-ISF ontology captures many of the connections in the data model. Local ontology extensions capture organization membership roles and their representatives, as well as roles related to stations and instruments. We utilize parts of the WGS84 and Global Change Information System (GCIS) ontologies to capture geospatial and scienti c instrument concepts, respectively. UNAVCO’s implementation also includes a handful of application extensions built to highlight data, instruments, and the people who manage them. For example, individual pages for stations have been extended to plot the station on a map, include a link to the data archive, and the station’s principal investigators. Another extension allows staff and community members to select their expertise and research areas from a curated list of terms. In addition to appearing on a person’s pro le page, a community- wide word cloud is generated and displayed on the home page.
View presentationGeosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationDean Krafft , Cornell
After deploying VIVO, adopters will nd that, overtime, data can become inconsistent, incomplete, or missing. This talk will focus on methods for identifying and resolving problematic data in an automated fashion. We will describe a reusable toolkit we have developed that utilizes SPARQL based rules for identifying data and VIVO's SPARQL API for updating, or correcting, these problems. Further, we will explain how web services are used to augment incomplete data. The toolkit and methods used will be extendable and reusable by other sites.
Steven McCauley ,
While multi-site search of research pro ling systems has substantially evolved in recent years, the deployed instances of pro ling systems substantially remain disconnected islands of Linked Open Data (LOD). CTSAsearch harvests VIVO-compliant LOD and provides a number of data integration services in addition to search and visualization services. Seventy- eight institutions are currently included, spanning nine distinct platforms. In aggregate, CTSAsearch has data on 168-415 thousand unique researchers and their 7 million publications. The public interface is available at http://research.icts.uiowa.edu/polyglot. This paper presents our experiences connecting CTSAsearch data integration services into the UCSF CrossLinks service, providing a means of directly interlinking researcher pro les across sites and platforms. Data Integration Services CTSAsearch integration services have been designed to support human exploration of the identity of pro led persons and automated linkage of LOD across systems. Services hence fall roughly along a human-system interface spectrum: Person by name query: This service accepts a last name and a rst name pre x and returns two discrete lists, one of “real” persons (i.e., pro les deemed as not stubs) and one of “stubs” (i.e., pro les appearing to only be placeholders in some pro ling system). The returned URIs can then be used as input for sameas queries below. Person by publication query: This service accepts a DOI or PMID and returns a list of pro led authors and their rank in the author list of the target publication. Output formats include HTML, JSON and XML. This service is speci cally designed to support inter-site linkage of coauthors. Person sameas query: This service accepts a person URI and returns a list of URIs referring to the same person. Currently, two URIs are asserted to refer to the same individual if they share one or more publications with the same PMID or DOI, have the same family name and either the same rst name or one rst name is a single initial that matches the rst name of the other. (All name comparisons are case insensitive.) Cross-linking Pro les Almost all research pro ling sites currently provide only internal links. In the case of extra-institutional co-authors, either no information is provided or stub pro les are generated containing only an author name generated from the citation. UCSF Pro les now harvests CTSASearch data to provide links to the non- institutional co-authors, and is working with Harvard to make this feature a part of the common Pro les RNS software. Bene ts arising from this feature include a richer web user experience, the ability to “crowd source” disambiguated data (an author at UCSF noticed a link to an incorrect author with a similar name at another institution, and has noti ed the administrators at the other institution), as well as improved SEO due to links from many top level domains. Conclusion CTSAsearch and CrossLinks demonstrate that substantial value can be added to the current research networking landscape through integration of these data. Our future work in this area will include enhanced ability to interconnect these systems and to visualize the resulting aggregated information space.
View presentationCTSAsearch (http://research.icts.uiowa.edu/ polyglot) visualizes co-authorship connections between the matched pro les using a force graph implemented in D3. Connections are pre-computed at pro le harvesting time using multiple alternative identi ers (DOI, PMID, and PMCID) present in the pro le data. OCLC pmid2doi crosswalk data is used to span the identi er spaces. Useful force graph visualizations are possible for ‘reasonable’ result scales (n ~ 200). This presentation will address recognition of research collaboration communities whose identity beyond the default notion of institution. Institution-level visualization Labeling nodes (pro les) by institutional af liation has proven useful for small-scale (n<200) graphs, particularly for topics relating to research communities relatively evenly distributed across institutions. However, for searches involving large numbers of pro les from a comparatively small number of institutions, the inherent substructure of the collaboration networks gets lost in the ‘hairball’ of interconnectivity. Inter-institutional community visualization Focusing on community detection in the network structure is proving to be a far more robust approach to untangling large networks. I use a user-selectable set of community detection algorithms [1,2] to identify community membership based upon characteristics of the local neighborhood. The resulting node coloring reveals natural substructure even in densely interconnected graph components. [1] V.D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, E. Lefebvre, Fast unfolding of communities in large networks, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp. 10, P10008 (2008) [2] L. Waltman and N. J. van Eck, A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection, Eur. Phys. J. B (2013) 86: 471.
View presentationGeosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationDavid Eichmann ,
VIVO's rich data model can be ideal for publishing information about research activity and making connections among these activities. However the technical architecture can be a challenge to deploy as a public facing website for potential adopters. This talk will describe a process for building a research discovery website from VIVO's data model but deployed as a static site, using just HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. This talk will identify the data mapping process, publishing steps, lessons learned, and identify future directions of pursuit.
View presentationAlexandre Rademaker ,
VIVO's rich data model can be ideal for publishing information about research activity and making connections among these activities. However the technical architecture can be a challenge to deploy as a public facing website for potential adopters. This talk will describe a process for building a research discovery website from VIVO's data model but deployed as a static site, using just HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. This talk will identify the data mapping process, publishing steps, lessons learned, and identify future directions of pursuit.
View presentationFabricio Chalub ,
Science, data, and research products are the focus of two new VIVO implementations, Connect UNAVCO (connect.unavco.org) and EOL Arctic Data Connects (vivo.eol.ucar.edu). The sites are being developed as part of EarthCollab, a project funded by The National Science Foundation. EarthCollab is a collaboration between UNAVCO, the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and Cornell University. UNAVCO is a non-pro t university- governed consortium that facilitates geoscience research and education using geodesy. NCAR’s Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL) manages observational data related to a broad range of research elds in the geosciences. Both organizations support a large community of researchers and collaborators, many of them at U.S. and international universities. VIVO, with the science-focused application and ontology extensions we are developing, connects the research output of our diverse communities with datasets, grants, and instruments managed by our organizations. Unique identi ers for people (i.e., ORCID), publications (i.e. publication DOIs), data (i.e. data DOIs) are included whenever possible to avoid confusion and to yield the most stable and effective connections. To date, Connect UNAVCO includes active pages for 650+ community members. The members are connected to 4000+ academic articles, 3,800+ datasets, and 3,600+ GPS stations managed by UNAVCO. The VIVO-ISF ontology captures many of the connections in the data model. Local ontology extensions capture organization membership roles and their representatives, as well as roles related to stations and instruments. We utilize parts of the WGS84 and Global Change Information System (GCIS) ontologies to capture geospatial and scienti c instrument concepts, respectively. UNAVCO’s implementation also includes a handful of application extensions built to highlight data, instruments, and the people who manage them. For example, individual pages for stations have been extended to plot the station on a map, include a link to the data archive, and the station’s principal investigators. Another extension allows staff and community members to select their expertise and research areas from a curated list of terms. In addition to appearing on a person’s pro le page, a community- wide word cloud is generated and displayed on the home page.
View presentationGeosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationBenjamin Gross ,
Science, data, and research products are the focus of two new VIVO implementations, Connect UNAVCO (connect.unavco.org) and EOL Arctic Data Connects (vivo.eol.ucar.edu). The sites are being developed as part of EarthCollab, a project funded by The National Science Foundation. EarthCollab is a collaboration between UNAVCO, the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and Cornell University. UNAVCO is a non-pro t university- governed consortium that facilitates geoscience research and education using geodesy. NCAR’s Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL) manages observational data related to a broad range of research elds in the geosciences. Both organizations support a large community of researchers and collaborators, many of them at U.S. and international universities. VIVO, with the science-focused application and ontology extensions we are developing, connects the research output of our diverse communities with datasets, grants, and instruments managed by our organizations. Unique identi ers for people (i.e., ORCID), publications (i.e. publication DOIs), data (i.e. data DOIs) are included whenever possible to avoid confusion and to yield the most stable and effective connections. To date, Connect UNAVCO includes active pages for 650+ community members. The members are connected to 4000+ academic articles, 3,800+ datasets, and 3,600+ GPS stations managed by UNAVCO. The VIVO-ISF ontology captures many of the connections in the data model. Local ontology extensions capture organization membership roles and their representatives, as well as roles related to stations and instruments. We utilize parts of the WGS84 and Global Change Information System (GCIS) ontologies to capture geospatial and scienti c instrument concepts, respectively. UNAVCO’s implementation also includes a handful of application extensions built to highlight data, instruments, and the people who manage them. For example, individual pages for stations have been extended to plot the station on a map, include a link to the data archive, and the station’s principal investigators. Another extension allows staff and community members to select their expertise and research areas from a curated list of terms. In addition to appearing on a person’s pro le page, a community- wide word cloud is generated and displayed on the home page.
View presentationGeosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationLinda Rowan ,
Science, data, and research products are the focus of two new VIVO implementations, Connect UNAVCO (connect.unavco.org) and EOL Arctic Data Connects (vivo.eol.ucar.edu). The sites are being developed as part of EarthCollab, a project funded by The National Science Foundation. EarthCollab is a collaboration between UNAVCO, the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and Cornell University. UNAVCO is a non-pro t university- governed consortium that facilitates geoscience research and education using geodesy. NCAR’s Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL) manages observational data related to a broad range of research elds in the geosciences. Both organizations support a large community of researchers and collaborators, many of them at U.S. and international universities. VIVO, with the science-focused application and ontology extensions we are developing, connects the research output of our diverse communities with datasets, grants, and instruments managed by our organizations. Unique identi ers for people (i.e., ORCID), publications (i.e. publication DOIs), data (i.e. data DOIs) are included whenever possible to avoid confusion and to yield the most stable and effective connections. To date, Connect UNAVCO includes active pages for 650+ community members. The members are connected to 4000+ academic articles, 3,800+ datasets, and 3,600+ GPS stations managed by UNAVCO. The VIVO-ISF ontology captures many of the connections in the data model. Local ontology extensions capture organization membership roles and their representatives, as well as roles related to stations and instruments. We utilize parts of the WGS84 and Global Change Information System (GCIS) ontologies to capture geospatial and scienti c instrument concepts, respectively. UNAVCO’s implementation also includes a handful of application extensions built to highlight data, instruments, and the people who manage them. For example, individual pages for stations have been extended to plot the station on a map, include a link to the data archive, and the station’s principal investigators. Another extension allows staff and community members to select their expertise and research areas from a curated list of terms. In addition to appearing on a person’s pro le page, a community- wide word cloud is generated and displayed on the home page.
View presentationSemantic Web technologies have been used in geoscience information and data applications for a couple of decades. Geoscience focused ontologies have been developed at many levels of detail, from controlled thesauri to formal ontology speci cations with properties, logical constraints, and underlying axioms. This geosciences semantic community has largely existed separately from the VIVO community. In the last ve years, however, a small number of VIVO instances have been deployed to manage and share information about geoscience projects, data, and other resources. Within the VIVO data model, almost everything can be represented as a rst- order object – not just people, organizations, publications and grants, but instruments, projects and their components, work groups, datasets, methodologies developed, presentations, and any other items of interest declared using appropriate ontologies. This panel will feature presentations that focus on using VIVO for scienti c applications. The goal will be to bring about discussion of the bene ts and drawbacks of representing scienti c information in VIVO. Presentation and discussion topics may include: extending the VIVO application interfaces, coupling the VIVO-ISF ontology to domain-speci c ontologies, and leveraging VIVO for supporting cross-organizational projects. The panel will be organized to engage the audience in questions about VIVO’s ability to support the use cases presented by scienti c research organizations and projects. These use cases may include using VIVO to represent information about multi-organizational and multi-disciplinary scienti c projects, and capturing the relationships between people, organizations, grants, datasets, publications, scienti c instruments, and research sites. Speakers in this panel will present about ongoing VIVO initiatives to illustrate current efforts.
View presentationGeosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationMatthew Mayernik ,
Science, data, and research products are the focus of two new VIVO implementations, Connect UNAVCO (connect.unavco.org) and EOL Arctic Data Connects (vivo.eol.ucar.edu). The sites are being developed as part of EarthCollab, a project funded by The National Science Foundation. EarthCollab is a collaboration between UNAVCO, the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and Cornell University. UNAVCO is a non-pro t university- governed consortium that facilitates geoscience research and education using geodesy. NCAR’s Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL) manages observational data related to a broad range of research elds in the geosciences. Both organizations support a large community of researchers and collaborators, many of them at U.S. and international universities. VIVO, with the science-focused application and ontology extensions we are developing, connects the research output of our diverse communities with datasets, grants, and instruments managed by our organizations. Unique identi ers for people (i.e., ORCID), publications (i.e. publication DOIs), data (i.e. data DOIs) are included whenever possible to avoid confusion and to yield the most stable and effective connections. To date, Connect UNAVCO includes active pages for 650+ community members. The members are connected to 4000+ academic articles, 3,800+ datasets, and 3,600+ GPS stations managed by UNAVCO. The VIVO-ISF ontology captures many of the connections in the data model. Local ontology extensions capture organization membership roles and their representatives, as well as roles related to stations and instruments. We utilize parts of the WGS84 and Global Change Information System (GCIS) ontologies to capture geospatial and scienti c instrument concepts, respectively. UNAVCO’s implementation also includes a handful of application extensions built to highlight data, instruments, and the people who manage them. For example, individual pages for stations have been extended to plot the station on a map, include a link to the data archive, and the station’s principal investigators. Another extension allows staff and community members to select their expertise and research areas from a curated list of terms. In addition to appearing on a person’s pro le page, a community- wide word cloud is generated and displayed on the home page.
View presentationMichael Daniels ,
Semantic Web technologies have been used in geoscience information and data applications for a couple of decades. Geoscience focused ontologies have been developed at many levels of detail, from controlled thesauri to formal ontology speci cations with properties, logical constraints, and underlying axioms. This geosciences semantic community has largely existed separately from the VIVO community. In the last ve years, however, a small number of VIVO instances have been deployed to manage and share information about geoscience projects, data, and other resources. Within the VIVO data model, almost everything can be represented as a rst- order object – not just people, organizations, publications and grants, but instruments, projects and their components, work groups, datasets, methodologies developed, presentations, and any other items of interest declared using appropriate ontologies. This panel will feature presentations that focus on using VIVO for scienti c applications. The goal will be to bring about discussion of the bene ts and drawbacks of representing scienti c information in VIVO. Presentation and discussion topics may include: extending the VIVO application interfaces, coupling the VIVO-ISF ontology to domain-speci c ontologies, and leveraging VIVO for supporting cross-organizational projects. The panel will be organized to engage the audience in questions about VIVO’s ability to support the use cases presented by scienti c research organizations and projects. These use cases may include using VIVO to represent information about multi-organizational and multi-disciplinary scienti c projects, and capturing the relationships between people, organizations, grants, datasets, publications, scienti c instruments, and research sites. Speakers in this panel will present about ongoing VIVO initiatives to illustrate current efforts.
View presentationAnne Wilson ,
Semantic Web technologies have been used in geoscience information and data applications for a couple of decades. Geoscience focused ontologies have been developed at many levels of detail, from controlled thesauri to formal ontology speci cations with properties, logical constraints, and underlying axioms. This geosciences semantic community has largely existed separately from the VIVO community. In the last ve years, however, a small number of VIVO instances have been deployed to manage and share information about geoscience projects, data, and other resources. Within the VIVO data model, almost everything can be represented as a rst- order object – not just people, organizations, publications and grants, but instruments, projects and their components, work groups, datasets, methodologies developed, presentations, and any other items of interest declared using appropriate ontologies. This panel will feature presentations that focus on using VIVO for scienti c applications. The goal will be to bring about discussion of the bene ts and drawbacks of representing scienti c information in VIVO. Presentation and discussion topics may include: extending the VIVO application interfaces, coupling the VIVO-ISF ontology to domain-speci c ontologies, and leveraging VIVO for supporting cross-organizational projects. The panel will be organized to engage the audience in questions about VIVO’s ability to support the use cases presented by scienti c research organizations and projects. These use cases may include using VIVO to represent information about multi-organizational and multi-disciplinary scienti c projects, and capturing the relationships between people, organizations, grants, datasets, publications, scienti c instruments, and research sites. Speakers in this panel will present about ongoing VIVO initiatives to illustrate current efforts.
View presentationJohn Furfey ,
Users are searching Duke’s VIVO, Scholars@ Duke for many reasons: Duke faculty to identify collaborators for research efforts, prospective students and their families to learn about our faculty and scholarship, patients to learn more about our medical providers, and industry to locate expertise. But many of our users have told us that our current search functionality is insuf cient to effectively and optimally facilitate those use cases. In this presentation, we will discuss in more detail the feedback which prompted this proposed enhancement of our search functionality, as well as, the key elements of the analysis and considerations that informed our nal design. Faculty and our broader user community have requested search functionality that enables them to lter results to the level of granularity required and by facets that are helpful. In addition, they would like to sort the search results by relevance or other factors to provide context for the results listed. Also, some users are seeking a very speci c set of results and need an 'advanced' search that’s easy to use. Our proposed enhancement of the Scholars@ Duke search functionality seeks to address those limitations by enhancing our basic search to provide more effective ltering of search results, enabling the search results to be sorted by relevance, and adding new advanced search capabilities.
View presentationUlysses Cannon ,
Many metrics may be used to evaluate a researcher’s scholarly impact. Because research articles are a prominent currency of academic scholarship, citation impact plays a central role in scholarly impact assessment. Times cited data are highly skewed, and it is well recognized in the bibliometrics literature that nonparametric approaches are appropriate for skewed distributions. By convention in bibliometrics the scholarly impact of an article is assessed against a reference set of other articles of the same publication type (i.e. academic article or review), in the same eld, and published the same year. The articles in the reference set are used as a baseline to calculate the percentile rank of the number of times a given article has been cited. To our knowledge, no currently available systems are capable of displaying article-level impact based on percentile rank of times cited for the entire percentile distribution. To support research impact assessment, we have developed the Citation Impact Tool, an interactive component of VIVO Dashboard. The system allows users to assess the percentile rank of the number of citations speci c articles have received relative to peer publications. Publications are individually benchmarked against reference sets of 200 articles of the same type, topical category of journal, and year of publication. Times cited data comes from Elsevier’s Scopus. The system uses an iconographic bar chart to portray article-level citation impact of multiple articles in one view, and allows users to lter by type of article, author order ( rst/last author rank), and topical category. The system uses Thomson Reuters Web of Science journal categories to assign articles to individual elds. When an article is in more than one category, the percentile rank of times cited is calculated separately against a separate reference set of articles for each category. A mean percentile rank for the article across categories is then calculated and, in turn, used in the bar chart. Because recently published articles have had little time to accumulate citations, articles from the past two to three years are deliberately excluded from the charts. The code will be shared with the community
View presentationPrakash Adekkanattu ,
Many metrics may be used to evaluate a researcher’s scholarly impact. Because research articles are a prominent currency of academic scholarship, citation impact plays a central role in scholarly impact assessment. Times cited data are highly skewed, and it is well recognized in the bibliometrics literature that nonparametric approaches are appropriate for skewed distributions. By convention in bibliometrics the scholarly impact of an article is assessed against a reference set of other articles of the same publication type (i.e. academic article or review), in the same eld, and published the same year. The articles in the reference set are used as a baseline to calculate the percentile rank of the number of times a given article has been cited. To our knowledge, no currently available systems are capable of displaying article-level impact based on percentile rank of times cited for the entire percentile distribution. To support research impact assessment, we have developed the Citation Impact Tool, an interactive component of VIVO Dashboard. The system allows users to assess the percentile rank of the number of citations speci c articles have received relative to peer publications. Publications are individually benchmarked against reference sets of 200 articles of the same type, topical category of journal, and year of publication. Times cited data comes from Elsevier’s Scopus. The system uses an iconographic bar chart to portray article-level citation impact of multiple articles in one view, and allows users to lter by type of article, author order ( rst/last author rank), and topical category. The system uses Thomson Reuters Web of Science journal categories to assign articles to individual elds. When an article is in more than one category, the percentile rank of times cited is calculated separately against a separate reference set of articles for each category. A mean percentile rank for the article across categories is then calculated and, in turn, used in the bar chart. Because recently published articles have had little time to accumulate citations, articles from the past two to three years are deliberately excluded from the charts. The code will be shared with the community
View presentationTerrie Wheeler ,
Geosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationHuda Khan , Cornell
Geosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationKeith Maull ,
Geosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationMike Daniels ,
Geosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationSteve Williams ,
Geosciences research, given its interdisciplinary and inter-organizational nature, is often conducted using distributed networks of researchers and resources including instruments and platforms. To better enable the discovery of the research output from the scientists and resources used within these organizations, UCAR[1], Cornell University, and UNAVCO[2] are collaborating on the EarthCollab[3] project which seeks to leverage semantic technologies to manage and link scienti c data. As part of this effort, we have been exploring how to leverage information distributed across multiple VIVO instances by working on mechanisms to enable a VIVO instance to lookup, consume, and display information from another VIVO instance without having to ingest RDF. The challenges we encountered and the path we took to support inter-VIVO communication can provide useful input to the larger discussion of how to extend VIVO’s infrastructure to more seamlessly integrate external information. Our presentation will include the following: • Demonstration of linking between VIVO instances: Using multiple VIVO instances setup as part of EarthCollab, we will show how we have extended VIVO’s core infrastructure to enable discovery of information from an external VIVO instance and support display of this external information within a VIVO pro le. • Technical infrastructure: Central to the interconnectivity demonstrated are the abilities to: (1) designate multiple URIs from separate VIVO name spaces as equivalent to each other or to an independent unique identi er (such as an ORCID ID) using sameAs assertions, (2) retrieve the appropriate URIs that might designate the same person using a lookup service based on (1), and (3) display information for a URI from a different VIVO instance without having to copy or duplicate information. We will also discuss how these extensions can support other linked data lookups and sources of information. In addition, we have built mechanisms for displaying all the RDF underlying a VIVO pro le. This RDF depiction can go far beyond the default linked data representation as it captures and presents the information about the related entities that is used to generate a particular pro le. As challenges and open questions, we will discuss how this mechanism of interconnectivity relies on reliable and open lookup options (e.g. Solr search indices) and how we have had to address how to open up our individual VIVO instances to enable communication. Additional questions include how to display the information obtained from an external VIVO instance, both in order to preserve the receiving VIVO instance’s brand and to handle discrepancies between ontologies, content, and/or VIVO versions. [1] http://www2.ucar.edu/ [2] https://www.unavco.org/ [3] http://earthcube.org/group/earthcollab
View presentationErica Johns ,
This presentation will explore the motivations behind and report early results of the VIVO for Historical Persons (VIVO4HP) project. This experiment seeks to reuse and extend VIVO and the VIVO-ISF ontology to represent and facilitate discovery of historical persons, a humanities use case that re ects VIVO’s original purpose. We will address whether VIVO can be reasonably adapted to this purpose, which would be of interest to a wider digital humanities community including other projects that are using linked data. VIVO4HP’s initial use case focuses on historical persons belonging to a speci c professional community – diplomats that served England in the seventeenth century. Our target data is derived from the standard British biographical source, the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (ODNB). This authoritative data set will be supplemented by event data on diplomatic missions from A Handlist of British Diplomatic Representatives. VIVO presents Linked Open Data, which offers the potential to make our use case data available to other digital humanities projects and applications for subsequent analysis, evaluation, and visualization. We are undertaking this experiment as a multi- stage project. The rst step is to manually create pro les in VIVO for a limited number of diplomats to identify issues with the source data, default ontology, data mapping and transformation, and online display. The second is to make adjustments to the ontology and online display to address gaps. The VIVO- ISF ontology re-uses and extends a number of established ontologies, such as FOAF and BIBO, and we will evaluate the integration of other ontologies relevant to our use case. The third is to automatically ingest ODNB data into VIVO, using custom scripts where possible to address data mapping and transformation issues. The nal step is to augment the pro les with other data sources, such as historical sources, other web sites, and linked data. We anticipate a variety of challenges and will be prepared to discuss how we addressed these. General issues with historical data include dealing with data ambiguity (e.g., dates, spelling variations), incomplete biographical information, individuals’ identities (e.g., using noble titles instead of their personal names), and historical geographies. The ODNB data was created with another purpose in mind and thus can be incomplete. It may be untagged or not tagged to the speci city necessary for certain types of data that might be desirable to represent for our use. Lastly VIVO is meant to represent a researcher’s professional life, and does not incorporate some of the personal, political, or social aspects desirable for representing historical persons. How our experiment is able to deal with these issues, and the level of intervention required, are key factors in our assessment of VIVO’s utility for the discovery and representation of historical persons. This focused assessment of extending VIVO for a humanities purpose should be of interest to a segment of VIVO conference attendees and community members. We hope to show that VIVO4HP provides an example that other humanists can build upon to represent, facilitate discovery of, and share linked data about historical persons.
View presentationThea Lindquist ,
This presentation will explore the motivations behind and report early results of the VIVO for Historical Persons (VIVO4HP) project. This experiment seeks to reuse and extend VIVO and the VIVO-ISF ontology to represent and facilitate discovery of historical persons, a humanities use case that re ects VIVO’s original purpose. We will address whether VIVO can be reasonably adapted to this purpose, which would be of interest to a wider digital humanities community including other projects that are using linked data. VIVO4HP’s initial use case focuses on historical persons belonging to a speci c professional community – diplomats that served England in the seventeenth century. Our target data is derived from the standard British biographical source, the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (ODNB). This authoritative data set will be supplemented by event data on diplomatic missions from A Handlist of British Diplomatic Representatives. VIVO presents Linked Open Data, which offers the potential to make our use case data available to other digital humanities projects and applications for subsequent analysis, evaluation, and visualization. We are undertaking this experiment as a multi- stage project. The rst step is to manually create pro les in VIVO for a limited number of diplomats to identify issues with the source data, default ontology, data mapping and transformation, and online display. The second is to make adjustments to the ontology and online display to address gaps. The VIVO- ISF ontology re-uses and extends a number of established ontologies, such as FOAF and BIBO, and we will evaluate the integration of other ontologies relevant to our use case. The third is to automatically ingest ODNB data into VIVO, using custom scripts where possible to address data mapping and transformation issues. The nal step is to augment the pro les with other data sources, such as historical sources, other web sites, and linked data. We anticipate a variety of challenges and will be prepared to discuss how we addressed these. General issues with historical data include dealing with data ambiguity (e.g., dates, spelling variations), incomplete biographical information, individuals’ identities (e.g., using noble titles instead of their personal names), and historical geographies. The ODNB data was created with another purpose in mind and thus can be incomplete. It may be untagged or not tagged to the speci city necessary for certain types of data that might be desirable to represent for our use. Lastly VIVO is meant to represent a researcher’s professional life, and does not incorporate some of the personal, political, or social aspects desirable for representing historical persons. How our experiment is able to deal with these issues, and the level of intervention required, are key factors in our assessment of VIVO’s utility for the discovery and representation of historical persons. This focused assessment of extending VIVO for a humanities purpose should be of interest to a segment of VIVO conference attendees and community members. We hope to show that VIVO4HP provides an example that other humanists can build upon to represent, facilitate discovery of, and share linked data about historical persons.
View presentationMarijane White ,